On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Lynn Winebarger <owinebar[_at_]free-expression.org> wrote:
>
> That should read "it is purported to be licensed rather than sold".
> Whether it is or not will be a matter for the USC to decide, as it
> involves Constitutional issues.
I see no Constitutional issues here. Are you referring to the enabling cause for intellectual property, or to some other Constitutional issue?
-- Carol Ruth Shepherd Arborlaw Associates PLLC Ann Arbor, Michigan USA 734 668 4646 v 734 663 9361 f business, technology, entertainment and new media law <shepherd[_at_]arborlaw.com>Received on Sat Jan 15 2000 - 18:04:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:37 GMT