Re: autographs

From: Neil Wilkof <wilkofnj[_at_]inter.net.il>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:57:17 +0200

On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Peter Groves <peter.groves[_at_]virgin.net> wrote:
>
> On 15 Jan 2000, Sylvie Fodor <s.fodor[_at_]akg.de> wrote:
> >
> > I would be interested to know how, according to your opinion,
> > Autographs -- meaning the photo of the signature of a person,
> > dead or alive, famous or not - are to be treated?
> >
> > Can they be protected by copyright? Do they have to be registered
> > as trademark?
> >
> > Any kind of answer out of any country is welcome.
>
> There cold be some copyright protection in the UK if it could be argued
> that the signature was an original artisitic work, but that would surely
> be a difficult argument to run. My advice to a client in this situation
> would be to try to register a trademark.

But how would a trademark application for an autograph fare in the U.K. in light of the Elvis case?

--
Neil Wilkof
Law Offices of Neil J. Wilkof
37 Itzhak Sadeh Street
POB 57543
Tel-Aviv 67213
Israel

Tel.: 972-3-562-5599
Fax: 972-3-562-3593
Email: wilkofnj[_at_]inter.net.il


*****************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and are intended solely for the use of the addressee. It may
contain privileged information that is exempt from disclosure
by law. If you are not the addressee, please note that unauthorized
dissemination, copying or accessing of this email and its contents
is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this email
in error, please inform us immediately by telephone at 972-3-562-5599
(collect if you wish).
Received on Tue Jan 18 2000 - 10:48:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:37 GMT