On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Terry Carroll <carroll[_at_]tjc.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Michael Reddy <mreddy[_at_]lrlaw.com> wrote:
> >
> > An attorney at the firm thought she had seen that there was a recently
> > enacted amendment dealing with software as a work made for hire. I
> > haven't been able to locate anything on Thomas. Is anyone on the list
> > familiar with this amendment?
>
> I don't think so. I'm aware of only one recent amendment related to the
> work made for hire: sound recordings were added to the types of work that
> may be agreed to be works made for hire under part (b) of the definition.
> This change was made in S.1948, sec. 1011(d) (incorporated by reference
> in Pub.L. 106-113 sec. 1000(a)(9)), Nov. 29, 1999).
.... and 106-113 is not even listed at
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/publaw/106publ.html.
I'm confused!
Thanks,
Mike Phillips
<mfslaw[_at_]mailandnews.com>
Received on Sun Jan 30 2000 - 16:20:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:38 GMT