On 3/20/2000, Paul J. Heald <heald[_at_]arches.uga.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Christopher Gwyn <christopher[_at_]icopyright.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hypothetical Case: Some one is wanting to use something protected
> > by copyright in a clearly "fair-use" way (perhaps making one copy
> > of one paragraph of a lengthy article to be read aloud in a classroom)
> > but -- being a well brought-up person -- seeks permission anyway. The
> > Publisher denies the permission request. The Requester decides to go
> > ahead with the use and is subsequently sued by The Publisher for
> > infringement.
> >
> > Would the fact that the person requested permission -- and that it
> > was denied -- have any bearing whatsoever on whether the use is or
> > is not an infringement?
>
> The Supreme Court in the 2 Live Crew case seems to indicate that a
> denied request for permission cuts in favor of fair use. After all,
> if a license is not available, then the owner cannot complain about
> having lost a license fee. This makes it harder for the owner to
> win the all important four prong of the fair use inquiry.
Beyond the 'fair use' issue, if the suggestion in the hypothetical that the use is in the "classroom", might the so-called 'face-to-face teaching exemption apply? To wit:
Sec 110. Limitations on exclusive rights: Exemption of certain performances and displays
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the following
are not infringements of copyright:
(1) performance or display of a work by instructors or
pupils in the course of face-to-face teaching activities of
a nonprofit educational institution, in a classroom or similar
place devoted to instruction...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Professor William J. Luddy, Jr.
(860) 548-2442 (Voice)
(860) 547-0866 (Facsimile)
(800) 433-4723 Ext. 2442
Email: <mailto:wjl[_at_]rh.edu>wjl[_at_]rh.edu
Received on Tue Mar 21 2000 - 11:36:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:38 GMT