Re: INFO/NYT: Controversial Software Protection Law Passed in Virginia

From: Cem Kaner <kaner[_at_]kaner.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 04:45:11 -0800

On 3/20/2000, Rod Dixon <rod[_at_]cyberspaces.org> wrote:
>
> Would someone post a URL directing me to a thoughtful piece presenting
> legal arguments challenging UCITA. Most of the material I have read
> so far (on anti-UCITA) seems to be heavy on policy and a little light
> on law or legal reasoning.

Another excellent source is:

Committee on Copyright and Literary Property of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York (co-sponsored by the Communications and Media Law Committee and the Entertainment Law Committee), Report on a proposal of the National Conference Of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws to adopt a proposed Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act.

   http://www.2bguide.com/docs/Copy.Comm1.pdf

---

Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D.
P.O. Box 1200, Santa Clara, CA 95052
<kaner[_at_]kaner.com>

http://www.kaner.com/
http://www.badsoftware.com/

Author (with Falk & Nguyen) of TESTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE (2nd Ed, VNR) Author (with David Pels) of BAD SOFTWARE (Wiley, 1998)

This e-mail communication should not be interpreted as legal advice or a legal opinion. The transmission of this e-mail communication does not create an attorney-client relationship between me and you. Do not act or rely upon law-related information in this communication without seeking the advice of an attorney. Finally, nothing in this message should be interpreted as a "digital signature" or "electronic signature" that can create binding commercial transactions. Received on Thu Mar 23 2000 - 12:31:11 GMT