On Wed, 10 May 2000, Christopher Gwyn <christopher[_at_]icopyright.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 09, 2000, Albert Henderson <noblestation[_at_]compuserve.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 6 May 2000, Lance Purple <lpurple[_at_]netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Because it would likely have stopped Shakespeare, Walt Disney,
> > > Andrew Lloyd Weber, and countless other artists from creating
> > > their most popular works:
> >
> > That is assuming they were too lazy to obtain the usual
> > permissions where needed and to pay appropriate fees and
> > royalties.
>
> You might also add "too broke to pay the fee" or "were denied
> permission" for any of a number of reasons. Not everyone has enough
> money to pay what is asked, and not every request for permission is
> granted - even if vast amounts of money are offered. Licensing is a
> very very useful approach, but it doesn't always benefit everybody.
Creative talent should be able to work within limits and demonstrate creativity. That is fundamental to the discipline of any art.
Albert Henderson
Editor, PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY
<70244.1532[_at_]compuserve.com>
Received on Tue May 16 2000 - 10:50:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:39 GMT