On Wed, 24 May 2000, Ewan Kirk <ewan.j.kirk[_at_]solent.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> In theory, yes, I suppose you could assert your fair use rights
> in court, but as most people will probably not want to go through
> the protracted legal process just for what may be a few lines of
> text for a quote, the practical effect is that digital rights
> management 'padlocks' have the potential to kill fair use stone
> dead.
Does Fair Use imply a right to browse?
Don't all the uses of a work that are considered
fair assume that the work has first been legally acquired?
If so, how then do DRM padlocks kill Fair Use stone dead?
-Bernard Rous <rous[_at_]hq.acm.org> Received on Thu May 25 2000 - 11:58:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:39 GMT