Re: DMCA hearings and protests

From: Cumbow, Robert <RCumbow[_at_]GrahamDunn.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 08:54:53 -0700

On Sat, May 27, 2000, Karsten M. Self <kmself[_at_]ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2000, Robert Cumbow <rcumbow[_at_]grahamdunn.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 25, 2000, Jon Noring <noring[_at_]netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > A law that can be abused to infringe on Free Speech is not a good law.
> >
> > I beg to differ. Any law can be abused. That's why, for better
> > or worse, we have a system of judicial review.
>
> 17 USC 512 specifically bypasses judicial review. Does your position
> change?

I beg to differ. Injunctive relief is provided for in section (j). Last time I looked, you couldn't obtain an injunction without involving a judge.

> Robert C. Cumbow
> Graham & Dunn, P.C.
> 1420 Fifth Avenue, 33rd Floor
> Seattle, Washington 98101-2390
> Phone: 206-340-9619
> Fax: 206-340-9599
> E-mail: rcumbow[_at_]grahamdunn.com
> Website: http://www.grahamdunn.com/
>

		Big law firm experience
	without the big law firm experience.SM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This email message may be protected by the attorney/client privilege, work product doctrine or other confidentiality protection. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, do not read it. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error. Then delete it. Thank you. Received on Tue May 30 2000 - 15:58:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:39 GMT