On 5/27/2000, Mark Charette <charette[_at_]sneezy.org> wrote:
>
> If indeed editorial changes, which to the layman may look
> insignificant but as you probably know take years of research are
> not copyrightable, what is the incentive to do that work other
> than the joy of knowing that you "got it right"? Dan Leeson, an
> eminent Mozart scholar, spent over 20 years on one measure of a
> work. He gets his pleasure out of hearing the work performed
> correctly, but what of someone else who expects some sort of
> compensation? Is this type of research altruistic only?
If one wants to be compensated for one's work, one should so arrange things. As in, "find a sponsor," "get a grant," "get a job." There's no need for perpetual rent-seeking, which frustrates the legitimate expectations of future generations to be able to use the fruits of human knowledge.
Vance
*Vance R. Koven Counselor at Law * * Law Offices of Vance R. Koven * *20 Park Plaza, Suite 633 Boston, MA 02116 * *tel: 617-482-3852 fax: 617-482-4972 * * net: vrkoven[_at_]world.std.com * *********************************************************Received on Tue May 30 2000 - 16:02:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:39 GMT