CNI-COPYRIGHT by thread

SubjectAuthor Date
DeCSS amicus briefDiane CabellWed May 31 2000 - 20:48:17 GMT
pictures of browsersMark KolberWed May 31 2000 - 20:17:23 GMT
digital images and copyrightO'Donnell, MargaretWed May 31 2000 - 15:47:54 GMT
Magnuson-MossMike PhillipsWed May 31 2000 - 14:13:07 GMT
students' copyrightAnkney, JoelTue May 30 2000 - 14:47:57 GMT
Re: students' copyrightHoward G. ZaharoffWed May 31 2000 - 13:37:26 GMT
Re: students' copyrightDodi SchultzWed May 31 2000 - 22:04:10 GMT
Re: students' copyrightRoland J. ColeThu Jun 01 2000 - 02:56:35 GMT
Winnie The PoohPhyllis I. SmithMon May 29 2000 - 22:16:26 GMT
Intellectual Property Rights support for European BusinessAlexander WeirMon May 29 2000 - 05:58:03 GMT
copyright under stressJohn LedererFri May 26 2000 - 15:02:01 GMT
Re: copyright under stressKevin GriersonSat May 27 2000 - 14:28:36 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJeremy G ByrneTue May 30 2000 - 10:46:58 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDavid HaleWed May 31 2000 - 15:12:09 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressWilliam S. LovellMon Jun 05 2000 - 23:45:21 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJoseph P. and Connie M. RioloMon Jun 05 2000 - 23:47:24 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJohn LedererTue Jun 06 2000 - 14:30:43 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressTimothy Arnold-MooreThu Jun 08 2000 - 09:24:12 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJohn LedererMon Jun 12 2000 - 20:56:18 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressMark DavisonWed Jun 14 2000 - 00:22:13 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressTimothy Arnold-MooreThu Jun 15 2000 - 05:36:58 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJeremy G ByrneThu Jun 08 2000 - 10:06:59 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDavid HaleFri Jun 09 2000 - 14:04:33 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredMon Jun 12 2000 - 01:18:10 GMT
Re: copyright under stressDodi SchultzSat May 27 2000 - 16:34:24 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJohn LedererWed May 31 2000 - 20:24:03 GMT
Re: copyright under stressEwan.J.Kirk[_at_]solent.ac.ukTue May 30 2000 - 09:33:31 GMT
Re: copyright under stressKaren CoyleTue May 30 2000 - 19:25:36 GMT
Re: copyright under stressMaureen HarringtonTue May 30 2000 - 23:16:02 GMT
Re: copyright under stressRansford PyleWed May 31 2000 - 12:04:34 GMT
Re: copyright under stressKevin GriersonWed May 31 2000 - 12:53:45 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredSat Jun 03 2000 - 03:32:22 GMT
--> Re: Anonymity online?Nils KuhnertMon Jun 05 2000 - 23:28:18 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJeremy G ByrneFri Jun 02 2000 - 23:06:21 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDRoe2Tue Jun 06 2000 - 04:57:54 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJeremy G ByrneFri Jun 09 2000 - 09:35:21 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDRoe2Sun Jun 11 2000 - 20:01:32 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressRod McCarvelWed Jun 14 2000 - 20:30:11 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredFri Jun 16 2000 - 01:54:34 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stress9ballFri Jun 16 2000 - 22:37:02 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredMon Jun 19 2000 - 16:43:13 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressPatricia RoshavenTue Jun 20 2000 - 14:34:20 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredWed Jun 21 2000 - 19:09:41 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDavid HaleMon Jun 12 2000 - 13:03:29 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressPeter D. JungerWed Jun 07 2000 - 09:41:30 GMT
Re: copyright under stressDodi SchultzWed May 31 2000 - 22:04:05 GMT
Re: copyright under stressDodi SchultzSat Jun 03 2000 - 04:20:34 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressPeter D. JungerWed Jun 07 2000 - 10:00:01 GMT
Re: copyright under stressEwan.J.Kirk[_at_]solent.ac.ukMon Jun 05 2000 - 08:54:42 GMT
Re: copyright under stressKevin GriersonTue Jun 06 2000 - 12:27:16 GMT
Re: copyright under stressVance R. KovenTue Jun 06 2000 - 12:23:03 GMT
Re: copyright under stressFreya AndersonTue Jun 06 2000 - 17:06:56 GMT
Re: copyright under stressDodi SchultzTue Jun 06 2000 - 23:32:54 GMT
Re: copyright under stressKevin GriersonWed Jun 07 2000 - 12:56:38 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJohn LedererThu Jun 08 2000 - 11:51:29 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredFri Jun 09 2000 - 02:29:08 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTimothy PhillipsThu Jun 08 2000 - 00:27:58 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDavid HaleThu Jun 08 2000 - 13:56:50 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredFri Jun 09 2000 - 23:14:09 GMT
Re: copyright under stressIkonen, GregThu Jun 08 2000 - 15:29:19 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTimothy PhillipsFri Jun 09 2000 - 23:31:25 GMT
Re: copyright under stressIkonen, GregMon Jun 12 2000 - 15:25:19 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertMon Jun 12 2000 - 15:40:23 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressLance PurpleTue Jun 13 2000 - 13:50:40 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stress9ballTue Jun 13 2000 - 15:09:15 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressRobert E. Jones, IIIWed Jun 14 2000 - 14:28:11 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressTerry CarrollWed Jun 14 2000 - 22:06:37 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressRoland J. ColeTue Jun 13 2000 - 16:43:02 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJeremy G ByrneWed Jun 14 2000 - 05:27:39 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertMon Jun 12 2000 - 15:49:56 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDot and JimTue Jun 13 2000 - 18:03:45 GMT
--> unconscious infringementTerry CarrollTue Jun 13 2000 - 19:09:56 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertMon Jun 12 2000 - 16:07:43 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredTue Jun 13 2000 - 15:53:07 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTyler OchoaMon Jun 12 2000 - 21:35:57 GMT
Re: copyright under stressNick SmithTue Jun 13 2000 - 00:44:58 GMT
Re: copyright under stressRansford PyleTue Jun 13 2000 - 23:14:08 GMT
--> Mary Baker EddyTerry CarrollWed Jun 14 2000 - 22:10:31 GMT
--> Re: Mary Baker EddyRansford PyleThu Jun 15 2000 - 10:33:34 GMT
--> Re: Mary Baker EddyTerry CarrollFri Jun 16 2000 - 19:43:25 GMT
--> Re: Mary Baker EddyMichael J. O'ConnorSun Jun 18 2000 - 20:18:09 GMT
--> Re: Mary Baker EddyRansford PyleMon Jun 19 2000 - 17:17:06 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTimothy PhillipsWed Jun 14 2000 - 00:05:16 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTimothy PhillipsWed Jun 14 2000 - 04:08:02 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressWilliam S. LovellThu Jun 15 2000 - 07:27:09 GMT
Re: copyright under stressRansford PyleWed Jun 14 2000 - 13:53:17 GMT
Re: copyright under stressHarold FederowWed Jun 14 2000 - 15:44:12 GMT
Re: copyright under stressFritz DolakWed Jun 14 2000 - 16:19:19 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJohn NobleThu Jun 15 2000 - 10:45:12 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressRobert A. KreissFri Jun 16 2000 - 20:06:58 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressLynn WinebargerSat Jun 24 2000 - 15:55:02 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJohn NobleTue Jun 27 2000 - 19:16:03 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stress9ballFri Jun 16 2000 - 20:12:24 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredMon Jun 19 2000 - 16:33:58 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDRoe2Sat Jun 17 2000 - 22:20:56 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDaniel LeeMon Jun 19 2000 - 16:47:25 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDRoe2Tue Jun 20 2000 - 15:03:29 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertWed Jun 14 2000 - 19:25:21 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredFri Jun 16 2000 - 01:32:44 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertWed Jun 14 2000 - 19:31:27 GMT
Re: copyright under stressKevin GriersonThu Jun 15 2000 - 12:56:18 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertThu Jun 15 2000 - 15:43:45 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertThu Jun 15 2000 - 15:49:49 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressRobert E. Jones, IIIFri Jun 16 2000 - 21:13:35 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredSat Jun 17 2000 - 06:07:37 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJohn NobleMon Jun 19 2000 - 20:15:21 GMT
Re: copyright under stressEdward BarrowThu Jun 15 2000 - 20:48:46 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stress9ballFri Jun 16 2000 - 22:43:00 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredSat Jun 17 2000 - 06:22:14 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTimothy PhillipsMon Jun 19 2000 - 03:28:46 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertMon Jun 19 2000 - 17:57:19 GMT
Re: copyright under stressEdward BarrowMon Jun 19 2000 - 19:54:41 GMT
Re: copyright under stressKevin GriersonTue Jun 20 2000 - 12:42:44 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTyler OchoaTue Jun 20 2000 - 18:36:04 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressKaren CoyleWed Jun 21 2000 - 16:38:44 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredWed Jun 21 2000 - 21:59:30 GMT
Re: copyright under stressEdward BarrowTue Jun 20 2000 - 18:57:40 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredWed Jun 21 2000 - 22:13:46 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertTue Jun 20 2000 - 18:32:21 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredWed Jun 21 2000 - 19:16:37 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressRod McCarvelThu Jun 22 2000 - 19:11:18 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredFri Jun 23 2000 - 16:44:29 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressKaren CoyleTue Jun 27 2000 - 17:27:40 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCalle OstergaardWed Jun 21 2000 - 09:07:21 GMT
Re: copyright under stressStephen FishmanWed Jun 21 2000 - 18:26:53 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressTerry CarrollThu Jun 22 2000 - 17:47:50 GMT
Re: copyright under stressKevin GriersonThu Jun 22 2000 - 12:23:40 GMT
Re: copyright under stresslsboyc[_at_]lsu.eduThu Jun 22 2000 - 13:24:59 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredFri Jun 23 2000 - 16:08:40 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertThu Jun 22 2000 - 15:25:35 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDavid HaleFri Jun 23 2000 - 13:43:07 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredFri Jun 23 2000 - 16:17:13 GMT
Re: copyright under stressroshavenThu Jun 22 2000 - 22:43:18 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJohn LedererFri Jun 23 2000 - 23:20:15 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressCNI-COPYRIGHT ModeratorMon Jun 26 2000 - 19:52:40 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressJohn LedererTue Jun 27 2000 - 14:27:20 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stresskmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comTue Jun 27 2000 - 18:05:36 GMT
Re: copyright under stressEdward BarrowThu Jun 22 2000 - 19:08:03 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressEric EldredSat Jun 24 2000 - 13:44:38 GMT
Re: copyright under stressHarold FederowFri Jun 23 2000 - 16:18:00 GMT
Re: copyright under stressLee T. LauFri Jun 23 2000 - 16:19:51 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTyler OchoaFri Jun 23 2000 - 21:45:42 GMT
Re: copyright under stressCumbow, RobertMon Jun 26 2000 - 16:11:43 GMT
Re: copyright under stresslsboyc[_at_]lsu.eduTue Jun 27 2000 - 13:38:41 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTyler OchoaTue Jun 27 2000 - 17:53:46 GMT
Re: copyright under stresslsboyc[_at_]lsu.eduTue Jun 27 2000 - 19:14:56 GMT
Re: copyright under stressHarold FederowWed Jun 28 2000 - 16:17:19 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressRobert ApgoodThu Jun 29 2000 - 22:05:04 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressDoni GauronskiWed Jul 05 2000 - 15:59:40 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressTerry CarrollThu Jul 06 2000 - 09:20:12 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressRobert E. Jones, IIIFri Jul 07 2000 - 13:02:00 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressBarbara RuhmannTue Aug 08 2000 - 17:45:55 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTaft, MaryWed Jun 28 2000 - 16:51:36 GMT
Re: copyright under stressKevin GriersonThu Jun 29 2000 - 13:00:52 GMT
Re: copyright under stressTimothy PhillipsThu Jun 29 2000 - 23:39:24 GMT
--> Re: copyright under stressTerry CarrollWed Jul 05 2000 - 18:21:46 GMT
Re: copyright under stressKevin GriersonWed Jul 05 2000 - 13:25:24 GMT
e-book publishingNeedtokno[_at_]mediaone.netFri May 26 2000 - 01:34:29 GMT
Re: e-book publishingIvan HoffmanSat May 27 2000 - 14:12:31 GMT
Re: e-book publishingCarol CricowSat May 27 2000 - 17:18:52 GMT
--> Re: e-book publishingEric EldredTue May 30 2000 - 13:57:09 GMT
Re: e-book publishingDodi SchultzWed May 31 2000 - 22:04:09 GMT
--> Re: e-book publishingKaren CoyleMon Jun 05 2000 - 19:58:19 GMT
--> Re: e-book publishingEric EldredMon Jun 05 2000 - 20:27:31 GMT
Re: e-book publishingBigbusie[_at_]aol.comMon Jun 05 2000 - 19:28:05 GMT
Re: e-book publishingDodi SchultzTue Jun 06 2000 - 16:52:20 GMT
Re: e-book publishingAlbert HendersonWed Jun 07 2000 - 11:31:53 GMT
--> Re: e-book publishingEric EldredFri Jun 09 2000 - 02:05:13 GMT
--> Re: e-book publishingJoseph P. and Connie M. RioloFri Jun 09 2000 - 14:08:46 GMT
Re: e-book publishinglsboyc[_at_]lsu.eduThu Jun 08 2000 - 13:42:00 GMT
--> Re: e-book publishingGrant HerndonThu Oct 05 2000 - 17:37:34 GMT
Re: e-book publishingAlbert HendersonMon Jun 12 2000 - 18:06:41 GMT
Re: e-book publishingAlbert HendersonTue Jun 13 2000 - 20:20:21 GMT
INFO/NYT: Digital Media Industry Response to Call for Copyright Law RevisionDavid P. DillardThu May 25 2000 - 15:52:42 GMT
models for apportionment of sales revenueWilmshurst, PaulThu May 25 2000 - 14:52:37 GMT
movie copyrightTaylor, RoseanneWed May 24 2000 - 20:23:40 GMT
Napster problemPeter BorisenkoTue May 23 2000 - 20:47:14 GMT
Re: Napster problemkmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comThu May 25 2000 - 07:38:59 GMT
Fair Use litigatable?Peter F CassidyTue May 23 2000 - 13:15:00 GMT
Re: Fair Use litigatable?Ewan.J.Kirk[_at_]solent.ac.ukWed May 24 2000 - 08:36:56 GMT
--> Re: Fair Use litigatable?Lynn WinebargerThu May 25 2000 - 13:36:34 GMT
Re: Fair Use litigatable?Powers, JamesWed May 24 2000 - 12:30:52 GMT
Re: Fair Use litigatable?Chris MohrWed May 24 2000 - 22:14:48 GMT
--> Re: Fair Use litigatable?Lynn WinebargerThu May 25 2000 - 13:22:11 GMT
Re: Fair Use litigatable?kmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comThu May 25 2000 - 07:35:46 GMT
Re: Fair Use litigatable?Bernard RousThu May 25 2000 - 11:54:09 GMT
--> Re: Fair Use litigatable?Karen CoyleFri May 26 2000 - 18:14:59 GMT
--> Re: Fair Use litigatable?Eric EldredSat May 27 2000 - 14:40:27 GMT
Re: Fair Use litigatable?Ewan.J.Kirk[_at_]solent.ac.ukFri May 26 2000 - 15:15:57 GMT
--> Re: Fair Use litigatable?Peter F CassidyMon May 29 2000 - 23:47:01 GMT
Re: Fair Use litigatable?Dodi SchultzFri May 26 2000 - 16:02:09 GMT
Re: Is it art theft?Linda GruberTue May 23 2000 - 06:37:47 GMT
INFO/NYT: Research Group Affiliated With Democratic Party Calls for Copyright Law RevisionsDavid P. DillardMon May 22 2000 - 15:02:51 GMT
INFO/NYT: Scour.com Adds Another Web Downloading Resource for Media EntertainmentDavid P. DillardMon May 22 2000 - 13:28:18 GMT
First Collecting SocietySylvie FodorMon May 22 2000 - 10:22:49 GMT
Re: First Collecting SocietyS. Martin KeletiTue May 23 2000 - 18:04:30 GMT
Re: First Collecting SocietySylvie FodorThu May 25 2000 - 14:59:11 GMT
--> Re: First Collecting SocietyEric EldredFri May 26 2000 - 20:15:25 GMT
Re: First Collecting SocietyTyler OchoaMon Jun 05 2000 - 21:03:52 GMT
--> Re: First Collecting SocietyTerry CarrollWed Jun 07 2000 - 22:04:43 GMT
Re: First Collecting SocietyTyler OchoaThu Jun 08 2000 - 18:36:27 GMT
MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??William S. LovellMon May 22 2000 - 04:03:26 GMT
Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??Vance R. KovenTue May 23 2000 - 12:50:35 GMT
Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??Timothy PhillipsThu May 25 2000 - 00:19:14 GMT
Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??charette[_at_]sneezy.orgThu May 25 2000 - 13:29:43 GMT
--> Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??Paul HealdFri May 26 2000 - 18:07:27 GMT
Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??Timothy PhillipsFri May 26 2000 - 12:04:50 GMT
Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??charette[_at_]sneezy.orgFri May 26 2000 - 18:32:19 GMT
Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??Timothy PhillipsSat May 27 2000 - 17:40:45 GMT
--> Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??Eric EldredTue May 30 2000 - 14:08:44 GMT
Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??Vance R. KovenTue May 30 2000 - 12:30:27 GMT
Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??Vance R. KovenTue May 30 2000 - 12:01:14 GMT
--> Re: MIDI sequencing -- copyrightable??Peter D. JungerFri Jun 02 2000 - 21:51:39 GMT
"Digital Millenium Copyright Act" -- casesKurt.Reindl[_at_]jk.uni-linz.ac.atSun May 21 2000 - 07:55:16 GMT
Re: "Digital Millenium Copyright Act" -- casesBob StockTue May 23 2000 - 01:22:01 GMT
more Napster / DMCAEric EldredFri May 19 2000 - 21:11:23 GMT
metadata a trademark?Marlene GordonFri May 19 2000 - 19:38:31 GMT
Re: metadata a trademark?Powers, JamesSat May 20 2000 - 17:30:32 GMT
--> Re: metadata a trademark?Thomas WorkmanMon May 22 2000 - 17:59:22 GMT
--> mp3s universities and osp liabilityGlenda MorganWed May 24 2000 - 19:26:28 GMT
--> Re: mp3s universities and osp liabilityMikael PawloThu May 25 2000 - 12:07:47 GMT
Re: metadata a trademark?Richard A. SchaferSun May 21 2000 - 00:01:28 GMT
Re: metadata a trademark?kmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comSun May 21 2000 - 21:22:48 GMT
Re: metadata a trademark?Harold FederowMon May 22 2000 - 16:10:28 GMT
--> Re: metadata a trademark?Timothy Arnold-MooreWed May 24 2000 - 04:52:09 GMT
cross linking agreementsDirceu PereiraFri May 19 2000 - 14:55:32 GMT
Re: cross linking agreementsStuart GibsonSun May 21 2000 - 04:54:56 GMT
published translations of English-language playLynne D. McCloskeyFri May 19 2000 - 13:08:04 GMT
Re: published translations of English-language playIvan HoffmanSat May 20 2000 - 13:47:28 GMT
is it art theft?Linda GruberFri May 19 2000 - 10:01:20 GMT
Re: is it art theft?Harold OrlansSat May 20 2000 - 14:17:49 GMT
Re: is it art theft?Dodi SchultzMon May 22 2000 - 17:24:31 GMT
--> Re: is it art theft?David HaleTue May 23 2000 - 14:35:47 GMT
--> Re: is it art theft?Terry CarrollWed May 24 2000 - 22:30:53 GMT
--> Re: is it art theft?Keith E. TaberWed May 24 2000 - 15:30:07 GMT
Re: is it art theft?Harold OrlansWed May 24 2000 - 15:49:33 GMT
copyright textbook / handbook recommendationsIslam, RamonaThu May 18 2000 - 20:16:23 GMT
permission deniedChristine L. SundtThu May 18 2000 - 18:24:05 GMT
Re: permission deniedPatsloane[_at_]aol.comFri May 19 2000 - 14:13:40 GMT
--> Re: permission deniedChristine L. SundtMon May 22 2000 - 16:24:32 GMT
Re: permission deniedDirceu PereiraFri May 19 2000 - 14:54:16 GMT
--> Re: permission deniedRobert A. BaronSun May 21 2000 - 20:55:33 GMT
Re: permission deniedPatsloane[_at_]aol.comMon May 22 2000 - 19:39:18 GMT
--> Re: permission deniedRobert A. BaronTue May 23 2000 - 12:57:05 GMT
Re: permission deniedPatsloane[_at_]aol.comTue May 23 2000 - 13:47:02 GMT
--> Re: permission deniedChristine L. SundtWed May 24 2000 - 15:14:57 GMT
--> Re: permission deniedKeith E. TaberThu May 25 2000 - 14:58:22 GMT
Re: permission deniedPatsloane[_at_]aol.comWed May 24 2000 - 13:01:12 GMT
Re: permission deniedPatsloane[_at_]aol.comThu May 25 2000 - 14:34:06 GMT
American GothicMatthew KrigbaumThu May 18 2000 - 15:34:13 GMT
Re: American GothicCopylaw[_at_]aol.comFri May 19 2000 - 13:45:18 GMT
Re: American GothicDavid HaleFri May 19 2000 - 14:39:48 GMT
Re: American GothicMichael_Carroll[_at_]cadc.uscourts.govFri May 19 2000 - 18:23:08 GMT
Re: American GothicCarol CricowFri May 19 2000 - 20:11:18 GMT
Re: American GothicStephen FishmanSat May 20 2000 - 03:54:28 GMT
Re: American GothicCanter, GinnySat May 20 2000 - 23:30:31 GMT
Re: American GothicBigbusie[_at_]aol.comMon May 22 2000 - 19:23:03 GMT
Re: American GothicWilliam GloverTue May 23 2000 - 15:24:49 GMT
search engines destroy western civilizationJQ JohnsonThu May 18 2000 - 13:31:26 GMT
Re: search engines destroy western civilizationJames RogersSat May 27 2000 - 05:50:34 GMT
Re: search engines destroy western civilizationkmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comSun Jun 11 2000 - 21:21:49 GMT
--> Re: search engines destroy western civilizationKeith E. TaberWed Jun 14 2000 - 17:01:44 GMT
--> Re: search engines destroy western civilizationkmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comFri Jun 16 2000 - 20:16:41 GMT
copyrighting fireTimothy PhillipsThu May 18 2000 - 04:06:50 GMT
copyrighting waterEric EldredFri May 19 2000 - 17:55:36 GMT
jazzsschaeferWed May 17 2000 - 17:45:07 GMT
Re: jazzCarol CricowThu May 18 2000 - 19:40:23 GMT
Re: jazzTimothy PhillipsSat May 27 2000 - 19:28:02 GMT
Eldred v Reno draft appeal briefEric EldredWed May 17 2000 - 15:37:20 GMT
DMCA hearings and protestsEric EldredWed May 17 2000 - 04:28:54 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsLee T. LauThu May 18 2000 - 22:17:00 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsLynn WinebargerFri May 19 2000 - 12:14:39 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsEric EldredSat May 20 2000 - 21:33:24 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestskmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comMon May 22 2000 - 16:22:03 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzFri May 19 2000 - 15:55:03 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsLynn WinebargerSun May 21 2000 - 03:24:40 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsKeith E. TaberTue May 23 2000 - 14:12:42 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsJon NoringSun May 21 2000 - 16:04:56 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzMon May 22 2000 - 17:24:35 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestskmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comTue May 23 2000 - 19:19:34 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsEric EldredWed May 24 2000 - 18:03:19 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsLynn WinebargerWed May 24 2000 - 14:03:08 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsJon NoringTue May 23 2000 - 12:48:51 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzWed May 24 2000 - 15:56:02 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsKeith E. TaberFri May 26 2000 - 14:53:44 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzWed May 24 2000 - 15:56:04 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzWed May 24 2000 - 15:56:00 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsEric EldredFri May 26 2000 - 03:42:45 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsHarold FederowWed May 24 2000 - 15:49:28 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsJon NoringThu May 25 2000 - 12:35:04 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsKevin GriersonFri May 26 2000 - 13:32:07 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsCumbow, RobertFri May 26 2000 - 16:34:41 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestskmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comSun May 28 2000 - 03:23:06 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsJon NoringSat May 27 2000 - 13:27:48 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsJon NoringSat May 27 2000 - 14:08:20 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsKevin GriersonSat May 27 2000 - 14:15:49 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzSat May 27 2000 - 16:34:22 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsEric EldredTue May 30 2000 - 13:45:37 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsLance PurpleTue May 30 2000 - 17:37:45 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsKeith E. TaberThu Jun 01 2000 - 14:02:33 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsEric EldredMon Jun 05 2000 - 20:29:33 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsLee TienThu Jun 01 2000 - 20:15:53 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsLee T. LauSun May 28 2000 - 01:21:01 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsJon NoringTue May 30 2000 - 13:03:48 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsCumbow, RobertTue May 30 2000 - 15:54:53 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestskmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comSat Jun 03 2000 - 04:13:41 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzTue May 30 2000 - 20:48:31 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestskmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comSat Jun 03 2000 - 04:11:53 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsBrad EnglundTue Jun 06 2000 - 00:29:46 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestskmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comTue Jun 06 2000 - 16:24:38 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsTerry CarrollTue Jun 06 2000 - 16:28:03 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzWed May 31 2000 - 22:04:04 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzWed May 31 2000 - 22:04:06 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsLance PurpleFri Jun 02 2000 - 23:31:51 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsEric EldredSat Jun 03 2000 - 03:09:07 GMT
--> Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDavid HaleMon Jun 05 2000 - 13:43:43 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsIkonen, GregSat Jun 03 2000 - 01:12:38 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsPowers, JamesSun Jun 04 2000 - 16:22:22 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzTue Jun 06 2000 - 03:48:34 GMT
Re: DMCA hearings and protestsDodi SchultzTue Jun 06 2000 - 23:32:55 GMT
renewal recordsEric EldredMon May 15 2000 - 23:26:42 GMT
Re: renewal recordsStephen FishmanTue May 16 2000 - 21:26:40 GMT
use of "comprised" in Australian patent applicationsTerry CarrollMon May 15 2000 - 21:13:58 GMT
Re: use of "comprised" in Australian patent applicationsPBallou[_at_]aol.comWed May 17 2000 - 01:04:10 GMT
Re: use of "comprised" in Australian patent applicationsT. Michael PoxonWed May 17 2000 - 02:35:55 GMT
Re: use of "comprised" in Australian patent applicationsRDeleault[_at_]aol.comWed May 17 2000 - 11:03:55 GMT
Re: use of "comprised" in Australian patent applicationsTimothy Arnold-MooreFri May 19 2000 - 07:37:11 GMT
unsolicited contributionsRobert A. BaronSun May 14 2000 - 12:26:27 GMT
Re: unsolicited contributionsPatsloane[_at_]aol.comTue May 16 2000 - 12:52:41 GMT
--> Re: unsolicited contributions9ballWed May 17 2000 - 14:01:02 GMT
Re: unsolicited contributionsFriedman, BarbaraTue May 16 2000 - 16:33:46 GMT
--> Re: unsolicited contributionsBrad EnglundThu May 18 2000 - 15:34:30 GMT
--> Re: unsolicited contributionsMichael J. O'ConnorFri May 19 2000 - 12:44:42 GMT
--> Re: unsolicited contributionsS. Martin KeletiFri May 19 2000 - 18:43:42 GMT
Re: unsolicited contributionsTerry CarrollTue May 16 2000 - 17:34:51 GMT
Re: unsolicited contributionsS. Martin KeletiTue May 16 2000 - 18:21:45 GMT
Re: unsolicited contributionsCumbow, RobertWed May 17 2000 - 16:28:15 GMT
--> Re: unsolicited contributionsRobert A. BaronFri May 19 2000 - 03:30:52 GMT
Re: unsolicited contributionsPatsloane[_at_]aol.comWed May 17 2000 - 17:13:00 GMT
Re: unsolicited contributionsPatsloane[_at_]aol.comThu May 18 2000 - 14:25:04 GMT
is email a copyright?Chai SouthSun May 14 2000 - 02:29:36 GMT
Re: is email a copyright?TeramisMon May 15 2000 - 16:11:40 GMT
Re: is email a copyright?Bruce E. HaydenMon May 15 2000 - 23:05:08 GMT
Re: is email a copyright?Patsloane[_at_]aol.comTue May 16 2000 - 16:02:57 GMT
Re: is email a copyright?Friedman, BarbaraTue May 16 2000 - 16:53:10 GMT
--> Re: is email a copyright?TeramisThu May 18 2000 - 05:23:20 GMT
Re: is email a copyright?Friedman, BarbaraSat May 20 2000 - 00:28:08 GMT
history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesdenayerbenoitSat May 13 2000 - 10:56:50 GMT
Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesTilyou1[_at_]aol.comMon May 15 2000 - 09:02:16 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesEric EldredTue May 16 2000 - 16:19:54 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesS. Martin KeletiTue May 16 2000 - 18:54:24 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesLynn WinebargerSat May 20 2000 - 13:49:31 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesEric EldredMon May 22 2000 - 16:48:40 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesTimothy Arnold-MooreWed May 24 2000 - 04:42:03 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesJoseph P. and Connie M. RioloSat May 27 2000 - 01:28:44 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the Stateskmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comSun Jun 11 2000 - 21:02:29 GMT
Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesJohn RiningerTue May 16 2000 - 15:53:16 GMT
Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesAlbert HendersonWed May 17 2000 - 23:02:31 GMT
Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesTimothy PhillipsThu May 18 2000 - 04:24:46 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesdenayerFri May 19 2000 - 09:21:32 GMT
Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesTimothy PhillipsSat May 20 2000 - 17:39:55 GMT
Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesMike OliverTue May 23 2000 - 03:27:58 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesSimonTue May 23 2000 - 15:50:59 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesJoseph P. and Connie M. RioloSat May 27 2000 - 01:38:39 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesLynn WinebargerWed May 24 2000 - 13:36:35 GMT
Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesMike OliverWed May 24 2000 - 21:32:40 GMT
--> Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesEric EldredFri May 26 2000 - 04:13:37 GMT
Re: history of the anti-copyright movement in the StatesTimothy PhillipsSat May 27 2000 - 17:45:33 GMT
Is stating a true fact "circumvention" ?Timothy PhillipsSat May 13 2000 - 00:28:32 GMT
Napster using DMCADry - KeithFri May 12 2000 - 15:38:03 GMT
websites: public vs private information?TeramisTue May 16 2000 - 18:44:50 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Tyler OchoaThu May 18 2000 - 00:27:22 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?William S. LovellTue May 23 2000 - 00:21:38 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Barry CaplanSat May 27 2000 - 17:09:00 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?William S. LovellTue May 30 2000 - 21:49:39 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Peter D. JungerFri Jun 02 2000 - 21:45:43 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?William S. LovellMon Jun 05 2000 - 23:32:53 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Barry CaplanSat Jun 03 2000 - 16:31:58 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?William S. LovellTue Jun 06 2000 - 00:05:50 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Barry CaplanSun Jun 11 2000 - 17:51:20 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Michael J. O'ConnorTue Jun 06 2000 - 14:06:27 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Karen CoyleWed Jun 07 2000 - 17:37:33 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Lee TienThu Jun 08 2000 - 19:39:52 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?John LedererTue Jun 06 2000 - 14:17:58 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Ralph CliffordWed Jun 07 2000 - 17:02:01 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?DRoe2Fri Jun 09 2000 - 00:32:48 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Peter D. JungerSun Jun 11 2000 - 12:02:11 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?William S. LovellFri Jun 09 2000 - 05:05:46 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Lynn WinebargerThu May 18 2000 - 09:11:43 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Dodi SchultzTue Jun 06 2000 - 03:48:35 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Barry CaplanSun Jun 11 2000 - 17:46:00 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Tyler OchoaMon Jun 05 2000 - 20:43:11 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Barry CaplanSun Jun 11 2000 - 17:49:15 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Ransford PyleTue Jun 06 2000 - 13:04:14 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Terry CarrollWed Jun 07 2000 - 22:18:38 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Roland J. ColeThu Jun 08 2000 - 13:52:45 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Ransford PyleTue Jun 06 2000 - 13:30:20 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?William S. LovellWed Jun 14 2000 - 02:18:34 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Dodi SchultzWed Jun 07 2000 - 16:46:34 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Cumbow, RobertWed Jun 07 2000 - 20:07:24 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Roland J. ColeThu Jun 08 2000 - 14:14:34 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?David SwarbrickMon Jun 12 2000 - 06:05:20 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Cumbow, RobertWed Jun 07 2000 - 20:56:15 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Mic PorterThu Jun 08 2000 - 10:18:44 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Ransford PyleThu Jun 08 2000 - 13:29:49 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Ransford PyleThu Jun 08 2000 - 15:04:36 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Roland J. ColeFri Jun 09 2000 - 16:23:37 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Karen CoyleMon Jun 12 2000 - 16:49:26 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Cumbow, RobertFri Jun 09 2000 - 00:13:27 GMT
--> individual "inventors" versus institutional "authors"Roland J. ColeFri Jun 09 2000 - 16:03:20 GMT
--> Re: individual "inventors" versus institutional "authors"Ransford PyleMon Jun 12 2000 - 02:30:23 GMT
--> Re: individual "inventors" versus institutional "authors"Roland J. ColeMon Jun 12 2000 - 14:37:56 GMT
--> Re: individual "inventors" versus institutional "authors"Dot and JimTue Jun 13 2000 - 20:19:46 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Ralph CliffordFri Jun 09 2000 - 17:40:06 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Dodi SchultzFri Jun 09 2000 - 17:45:09 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Dodi SchultzFri Jun 09 2000 - 17:45:11 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Ransford PyleSun Jun 11 2000 - 16:21:29 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Ransford PyleMon Jun 12 2000 - 01:30:50 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Dodi SchultzMon Jun 12 2000 - 18:44:33 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Timothy Arnold-MooreThu Jun 15 2000 - 00:26:56 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Dodi SchultzMon Jun 12 2000 - 18:44:31 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Tyler OchoaMon Jun 12 2000 - 21:29:20 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Ransford PyleTue Jun 13 2000 - 23:07:56 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Edward BarrowThu Jun 15 2000 - 18:32:34 GMT
--> Re: websites: public vs private information?Dot and JimFri Jun 16 2000 - 23:22:30 GMT
INFO/NYT: The Legal Position In Which Napster Currently Finds ItselfDavid P. DillardFri May 12 2000 - 13:02:23 GMT
a fine kettle of fishJohn LedererThu May 11 2000 - 20:19:46 GMT
Re: a fine kettle of fishEric EldredSat May 13 2000 - 21:48:57 GMT
--> Re: a fine kettle of fishkmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comTue May 16 2000 - 17:24:54 GMT
Re: a fine kettle of fishPete LukacsSun May 14 2000 - 10:23:08 GMT
--> Re: a fine kettle of fishJames RogersTue May 16 2000 - 15:27:21 GMT
--> Re: a fine kettle of fishEric EldredWed May 17 2000 - 15:26:20 GMT
--> Re: a fine kettle of fishkmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comWed May 17 2000 - 17:20:41 GMT
Re: a fine kettle of fishTom KellerMon May 15 2000 - 18:53:49 GMT
seeking US patent dataEugen MattesThu May 11 2000 - 03:42:42 GMT
INFO/NYT: Copyright Was a Quaint Idea In Its TimeDavid P. DillardWed May 10 2000 - 10:53:43 GMT
Re: INFO/NYT: Copyright Was a Quaint Idea In Its TimeChristopher GwynThu May 11 2000 - 00:57:38 GMT
Re: INFO/NYT: Copyright Was a Quaint Idea In Its Timecharette[_at_]sneezy.orgThu May 11 2000 - 13:11:24 GMT
Re: INFO/NYT: Copyright Was a Quaint Idea In Its Timejay beahmThu May 11 2000 - 20:29:51 GMT
Re: INFO/NYT: Copyright Was a Quaint Idea In Its TimeTimothy PhillipsFri May 12 2000 - 02:35:56 GMT
Re: INFO/NYT: Copyright Was a Quaint Idea In Its TimeVance R. KovenFri May 12 2000 - 13:04:34 GMT
Re: INFO/NYT: Copyright Was a Quaint Idea In Its TimeChristopher GwynSat May 13 2000 - 18:41:03 GMT
job descriptionAletha HonsowitzTue May 09 2000 - 14:49:29 GMT
competition & IP seminarA.KampermanSanders[_at_]PR.UNIMAAS.NLTue May 09 2000 - 10:35:07 GMT
Berlin WallCumbow, RobertTue May 09 2000 - 01:28:20 GMT
Re: Berlin WallPowers, JamesWed May 10 2000 - 16:17:25 GMT
Re: Berlin WallArnd BoekenThu May 11 2000 - 14:30:26 GMT
Re: Berlin WallTony FogarassyFri May 12 2000 - 16:12:24 GMT
Re: Berlin WallSandy Jane WongSat May 13 2000 - 03:07:57 GMT
Re: Berlin WallSylvie FodorTue May 16 2000 - 07:13:49 GMT
Re: Berlin WallCumbow, RobertWed May 17 2000 - 16:17:07 GMT
poster for copy machineTaylor, RoseanneMon May 08 2000 - 21:22:31 GMT
title protection?Eric EldredSun May 07 2000 - 20:33:10 GMT
Re: title protection?John R. LevineMon May 08 2000 - 12:06:58 GMT
Re: title protection?mburke[_at_]lib.usf.eduMon May 08 2000 - 15:35:32 GMT
--> Re: title protection?John R. LevineTue May 09 2000 - 18:43:28 GMT
Re: title protection?DRoe2Tue May 09 2000 - 12:36:37 GMT
--> Re: title protection?Michael D. OliverThu May 11 2000 - 01:59:02 GMT
--> Re: title protection?Eric EldredFri May 12 2000 - 17:21:26 GMT
--> Re: title protection?John R. LevineTue May 16 2000 - 04:52:34 GMT
--> Re: title protection?Jessica R. FriedmanWed May 17 2000 - 13:13:15 GMT
--> Re: title protection?DRoe2Fri May 19 2000 - 00:19:06 GMT
--> Re: title protection?Eric EldredWed May 17 2000 - 14:41:29 GMT
Re: title protection?Cumbow, RobertMon May 15 2000 - 15:55:30 GMT
Re: title protection?Ikonen, GregTue May 16 2000 - 13:59:32 GMT
Re: title protection?Cumbow, RobertThu May 18 2000 - 15:38:13 GMT
--> Re: title protection?9ballFri May 19 2000 - 15:23:56 GMT
--> Re: title protection?Bernard KatzMon May 22 2000 - 06:50:03 GMT
--> Re: title protection?Eric EldredTue May 23 2000 - 16:16:03 GMT
Re: title protection?Ransford PyleSun May 21 2000 - 13:07:17 GMT
Re: title protection?Kevin GriersonMon May 22 2000 - 13:31:44 GMT
Re: title protection?Cumbow, RobertMon May 22 2000 - 17:05:48 GMT
Re: title protection?Kevin GriersonTue May 23 2000 - 12:09:59 GMT
Re: title protection?Cumbow, RobertTue May 23 2000 - 16:04:27 GMT
Re: title protection?Stephen FishmanWed May 24 2000 - 00:00:47 GMT
Re: title protection?Cumbow, RobertWed May 24 2000 - 16:25:27 GMT
Re: title protection?Cumbow, RobertWed May 24 2000 - 16:31:51 GMT
domain namesDry - KeithFri May 05 2000 - 15:57:51 GMT
benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Jon NoringFri May 05 2000 - 13:09:12 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Timothy PhillipsSat May 06 2000 - 13:15:56 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Lance PurpleSat May 06 2000 - 15:29:08 GMT
--> copyright and "The Jungle Book"Terry CarrollMon May 08 2000 - 21:10:01 GMT
--> Re: copyright and "The Jungle Book"Lance PurpleTue May 09 2000 - 12:15:08 GMT
--> Re: copyright and "The Jungle Book"Eric EldredFri May 12 2000 - 17:15:02 GMT
--> Re: copyright and "The Jungle Book"Jeroen HellingmanTue May 09 2000 - 16:18:50 GMT
--> Re: copyright and "The Jungle Book"Timothy Arnold-MooreFri May 12 2000 - 05:33:43 GMT
--> Re: copyright and "The Jungle Book"Terry CarrollMon May 15 2000 - 18:08:11 GMT
--> Re: copyright and "The Jungle Book"Lance PurpleWed May 17 2000 - 14:45:39 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Wendy SeltzerTue May 09 2000 - 13:33:58 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Peter GrovesWed May 10 2000 - 11:46:19 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Lance PurpleThu May 11 2000 - 12:51:35 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Anthony.McCannMon May 08 2000 - 09:25:32 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Cumbow, RobertMon May 08 2000 - 17:14:11 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Peter GrovesWed May 10 2000 - 11:55:37 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Peter D. JungerWed May 10 2000 - 13:00:40 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Dodi SchultzTue May 09 2000 - 16:12:13 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Albert HendersonTue May 09 2000 - 21:27:17 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Lance PurpleWed May 10 2000 - 14:09:17 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Anthony.McCannWed May 10 2000 - 11:10:02 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Robert A. BaronSun May 14 2000 - 13:15:18 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Christopher GwynWed May 10 2000 - 17:15:26 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?9ballThu May 11 2000 - 19:01:02 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Eric EldredSat May 13 2000 - 19:01:16 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Tyler OchoaWed May 10 2000 - 22:22:44 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Tyler OchoaThu May 11 2000 - 18:00:28 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Dodi SchultzThu May 11 2000 - 20:46:24 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Joseph P. and Connie M. RioloFri May 12 2000 - 02:16:37 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Anthony.McCannSat May 13 2000 - 15:32:48 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Albert HendersonTue May 16 2000 - 10:47:24 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Albert HendersonTue May 16 2000 - 10:47:26 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Eric EldredWed May 17 2000 - 15:00:29 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Michael J. O'ConnorThu May 18 2000 - 15:37:33 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Smith, RobertWed May 17 2000 - 14:04:48 GMT
--> in support of limited term and explict labelsRoland J. ColeThu May 18 2000 - 20:25:08 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Tyler OchoaWed May 17 2000 - 23:15:41 GMT
--> Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Eric EldredThu May 18 2000 - 22:30:41 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Timothy PhillipsThu May 18 2000 - 04:00:58 GMT
Re: benefits of the public domain and limited copyright terms?Timothy PhillipsFri May 19 2000 - 03:54:21 GMT
copyright in designsStuart GibsonThu May 04 2000 - 08:21:30 GMT
Re: copyright in designsTimothy Arnold-MooreFri May 12 2000 - 04:43:32 GMT
--> Re: copyright in designsDavid HaleTue May 16 2000 - 15:02:14 GMT
MP3Stuart GibsonThu May 04 2000 - 07:11:58 GMT
Re: MP3David BasskinFri May 05 2000 - 14:27:51 GMT
Re: MP3Timothy Arnold-MooreFri May 12 2000 - 04:33:30 GMT
Re: MP3Stuart GibsonMon May 15 2000 - 06:23:24 GMT
Headlines: Bytes in Brief -- MaySharonN164[_at_]aol.comWed May 03 2000 - 22:17:48 GMT
Taxes, Libraries, and the InternetJerremie Vernon ClydeWed May 03 2000 - 18:54:06 GMT
software suite copyright infringementShawn CheadleTue May 02 2000 - 21:14:07 GMT
works, copies, and licensesPeter D. JungerTue May 02 2000 - 14:54:27 GMT
"state copyright" -- history questionLynn WinebargerTue May 02 2000 - 11:14:05 GMT
Re: "state copyright" -- history questionChris MohrWed May 03 2000 - 22:40:08 GMT
software development by staffBarbara TranMon May 01 2000 - 15:50:11 GMT
Re: software development by staffS. Martin KeletiTue May 02 2000 - 17:54:30 GMT
Re: software development by staffStephen FishmanTue May 02 2000 - 19:42:48 GMT
Re: software development by staffVance R. KovenWed May 03 2000 - 11:08:48 GMT
Re: software development by staffMatthew KrigbaumTue May 09 2000 - 13:27:07 GMT
--> Re: software development by staffPatrick BegosWed May 10 2000 - 12:17:51 GMT
--> Re: software development by staffMichael D. OliverThu May 11 2000 - 02:06:08 GMT
--> Re: software development by staffShelly WarwickFri May 12 2000 - 15:02:28 GMT
--> Re: software development by staffMichael D. OliverTue May 16 2000 - 02:03:19 GMT
Re: software development by staffStephen FishmanWed May 10 2000 - 19:27:07 GMT
Re: software development by staffTyler OchoaWed May 10 2000 - 21:54:07 GMT
Re: software development by staffMenno IsraelThu May 11 2000 - 10:04:36 GMT
Re: software development by staffHoward G. ZaharoffThu May 11 2000 - 12:32:46 GMT
Re: software development by staffHarold FederowThu May 11 2000 - 15:50:11 GMT
Re: questions about Disney characters...David HaleMon May 01 2000 - 13:59:10 GMT
Re: questions about Disney characters...Henslee, WilliamTue May 02 2000 - 17:06:48 GMT
Re: Circular 92 updatedkmself[_at_]ix.netcom.comMon May 01 2000 - 08:12:23 GMT
Re: definition of "asynchronous" on-line course deliverylsboyc[_at_]lsu.eduMon May 01 2000 - 14:56:43 GMT
Re: definition of "asynchronous" on-line course deliveryRich WigginsMon May 01 2000 - 15:48:27 GMT
Re: idea vs. serviceNelson E. TimkenMon May 01 2000 - 12:08:27 GMT
Napster destroys Western CivilizationJames RogersWed May 03 2000 - 14:37:03 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDaniel LeeThu May 04 2000 - 14:41:45 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationPeter HirtleFri May 05 2000 - 13:07:50 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDavid HaleFri May 05 2000 - 14:27:55 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationLynn WinebargerWed May 10 2000 - 07:08:20 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballThu May 11 2000 - 19:08:52 GMT
--> sale of used promotional CDsBrad EnglundThu May 11 2000 - 23:36:17 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballThu May 11 2000 - 20:03:54 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationEric EldredSat May 13 2000 - 19:42:42 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererSun May 07 2000 - 15:35:32 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDavid HaleMon May 08 2000 - 14:02:18 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererTue May 09 2000 - 21:45:42 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDry - KeithTue May 09 2000 - 15:26:56 GMT
--> universities and MP3 filesGlenda MorganTue May 09 2000 - 20:23:19 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationCarl HartmannThu May 04 2000 - 13:02:33 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJames RogersFri May 05 2000 - 12:11:21 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationSully, Sarah E.Thu May 04 2000 - 14:40:46 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationChristopher GwynThu May 04 2000 - 16:51:38 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationTilyou1[_at_]aol.comThu May 04 2000 - 16:59:02 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJames RogersFri May 05 2000 - 10:58:00 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationChristopher GwynFri May 05 2000 - 20:01:49 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationEric EldredSat May 06 2000 - 19:26:34 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJeroen HellingmanSat May 06 2000 - 20:43:58 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationShelly WarwickTue May 09 2000 - 05:30:12 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballThu May 11 2000 - 19:35:03 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationGeorge WaringSat May 13 2000 - 22:53:54 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDavid HaleMon May 15 2000 - 21:58:20 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererSat May 06 2000 - 20:58:54 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationPete LukacsMon May 08 2000 - 10:22:52 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererTue May 09 2000 - 22:31:10 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationRoland J. ColeWed May 10 2000 - 20:25:01 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDavid HaleThu May 11 2000 - 13:32:18 GMT
--> portaits: verbal agreement and assignment of rights (work for hire)Gallotti AlbertoFri Sep 08 2000 - 09:54:26 GMT
--> RE: portaits: verbal agreement and assignment of rights (work forhire)Greg ErkinsSat Sep 09 2000 - 02:15:24 GMT
--> Re: portaits: verbal agreement and assignment of rights (work for hire)Gallotti AlbertoSat Sep 09 2000 - 08:39:00 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJonMEsq[_at_]aol.comMon May 08 2000 - 13:06:29 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererTue May 09 2000 - 22:44:07 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationLynn WinebargerWed May 10 2000 - 00:12:39 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationColin GoffWed May 10 2000 - 15:31:48 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationLynn WinebargerThu May 11 2000 - 12:27:47 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationS. Martin KeletiThu May 11 2000 - 16:12:59 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationRod McCarvelThu May 11 2000 - 20:26:21 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDry - KeithFri May 12 2000 - 15:54:03 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationEric EldredFri May 12 2000 - 18:23:43 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballThu May 11 2000 - 18:05:16 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererSat May 13 2000 - 15:25:36 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDry - KeithTue May 16 2000 - 14:39:54 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationCumbow, RobertMon May 08 2000 - 17:33:40 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballTue May 09 2000 - 12:53:33 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererWed May 10 2000 - 13:11:35 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationS. Martin KeletiThu May 11 2000 - 16:03:58 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballThu May 11 2000 - 17:53:28 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDaniel LeeWed May 10 2000 - 18:25:50 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballThu May 11 2000 - 17:25:54 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationGeorge L. AbbottThu May 11 2000 - 18:24:22 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationPowers, JamesTue May 09 2000 - 18:13:49 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJames RogersWed May 10 2000 - 12:12:28 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererWed May 10 2000 - 14:46:44 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationRod McCarvelThu May 11 2000 - 20:26:21 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn NobleThu May 11 2000 - 20:16:13 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererWed May 10 2000 - 03:11:45 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJames RogersFri May 12 2000 - 03:17:52 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationMichael TrittipoTue May 16 2000 - 17:02:58 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDodi SchultzWed May 10 2000 - 16:40:32 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationPowers, JamesThu May 11 2000 - 12:13:42 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationPowers, JamesThu May 11 2000 - 12:18:47 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationHarold FederowThu May 11 2000 - 15:51:14 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationEdward BarrowSat May 13 2000 - 12:18:53 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDodi SchultzSat May 13 2000 - 16:23:35 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererMon May 15 2000 - 11:51:00 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationTimothy Arnold-MooreTue May 16 2000 - 04:09:23 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballWed May 17 2000 - 19:12:15 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationTimothy Arnold-MooreFri May 19 2000 - 08:20:00 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballMon May 22 2000 - 15:46:00 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationCumbow, RobertSat May 13 2000 - 21:01:15 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballMon May 15 2000 - 14:54:13 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationCumbow, RobertSat May 13 2000 - 21:12:24 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballMon May 15 2000 - 14:50:06 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationPeter HirtleTue May 16 2000 - 11:33:40 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn NobleTue May 16 2000 - 16:29:55 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn LedererWed May 17 2000 - 12:33:39 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationTerry CarrollTue May 16 2000 - 17:40:38 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballWed May 17 2000 - 13:27:17 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJohn NobleThu May 18 2000 - 15:41:15 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationTerry CarrollThu May 18 2000 - 19:05:01 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationKaren CoyleMon May 15 2000 - 22:00:44 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationGriffiths, JonathanMon May 15 2000 - 08:52:23 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationCumbow, RobertMon May 15 2000 - 15:58:00 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationCumbow, RobertMon May 15 2000 - 16:20:01 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationRwstim[_at_]aol.comMon May 15 2000 - 17:45:44 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationCumbow, RobertTue May 16 2000 - 18:09:26 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballWed May 17 2000 - 13:17:51 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJoseph P. and Connie M. RioloSat May 27 2000 - 00:59:43 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationLynn WinebargerWed May 17 2000 - 20:56:04 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization9ballThu May 18 2000 - 16:13:05 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationLynn WinebargerFri May 19 2000 - 12:06:51 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationDodi SchultzTue May 16 2000 - 20:30:27 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationJeremy G ByrneWed May 17 2000 - 14:19:31 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationSimonWed May 17 2000 - 15:48:08 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western CivilizationEric EldredThu May 18 2000 - 21:46:14 GMT
--> Re: Napster destroys Western Civilization