Re: copyright by successors of Barrie J.M.

From: Kevin Grierson <kgrierson[_at_]wilsav.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:31:27 -0400

On 07/21/2000, Ewan Kirk <ewan.j.kirk[_at_]solent.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> By way of correction to my last posting: the perpetual right mentioned
> in s.301 of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 is not a full
> copyright, but merely a right to recieve royalties. Therefore it
> appears that the trustees of Great Ormond Street Hospital cannot object
> to any use of the work, but are merely entitled to a royalty from it.

Is the royalty rate set by statute?

Kevin Grierson

---

Kevin W. Grierson
kgrierson[_at_]wilsav.com
ph: 757/628-5603 fx: 757/628-5566
Willcox & Savage, P.C.
http://www.willcoxandsavage.com/

---

Received on Tue Jul 25 2000 - 21:35:10 GMT