Re: Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8.

On Sat, Jul 29, 2000, Karsten M. Self <kmself[_at_]ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
> The recent (current -- status update Eric?) Eldritch v. Reno case
> attempted to clarify what "for limited times" means. Initial finding
> was for the defendent -- eg: life + n years is considered "limited".
> Frankly, the court's logic fails me.

   http://eon.law.harvard.edu/eldredvreno

appeal briefs filed, appellants' reply due Aug 4, oral arguments Oct 5, Washington DC. OpenLaw discussion still open to all. see you there.

Eric Eldred
<eldred[_at_]eldritchpress.org> Received on Mon Jul 31 2000 - 13:39:14 GMT