Re: Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8.

From: Cumbow, Robert <RCumbow[_at_]GrahamDunn.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:26:41 -0700

On Fri, Jul 28, 2000, Christopher Gwyn <christopher[_at_]icopyright.com> wrote:
>
> "To promote the progress of science and useful arts by securing
> for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive rights
> to their respective writings and discoveries."
> (United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8).
>
> Copyright law as enacted in the United States clearly allows an author
> to sell the copyright to a work that he or she has created. I can't
> think of any interpretation of Clause 8 that would not allow an author
> to license a work in any way that he or she sees fit... But if the
> author has the "exclusive rights to their... writings" -- does that
> mean that the author can act to deprive his or her self of that
> right -- i.e. sell the copyright.
>
> References to cases where an author was accused, and even convicted,
> of infringement have been mentioned recently. I would assume that
> if an author granted an exclusive license to "MegaCorp", and then
> created a derivative work, that the derivative work could be an
> infringement of MegaCorp's license. So a "self-infringement" case
> might not quite address whether an author can sell a copyright --
> particularly if it didn't get to the Supreme Court.
>
> Can anyone think of a Supreme Court case that speaks to whether an
> author can actually _sell_ a copyright? (Or for that matter if the
> Supreme Court has ever defined what "for limited times" means?)

It doesn't take a Supreme Court opinion to determine whether an author can sell a copyright. All it takes is 17 USC 201(d)(1).

Robert C. Cumbow
 Graham & Dunn PC
 1420 Fifth Avenue, 33rd Floor
 Seattle, WA 98101-2390
 206.340.9619
 206.340.9599 fax
 rcumbow[_at_]grahamdunn.com
 http://www.grahamdunn.com/  

        Big law firm experience
without the big law firm experience SM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This email message may be protected by the attorney/client privilege, work product doctrine or other confidentiality protection. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, do not read it. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you. Received on Mon Jul 31 2000 - 15:35:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:40 GMT