Recently, I have been doing research into the Contentville settlement with
the NWU and I understand that there is a new case against Northern Light and
some others.
My question is, since these servcies license the material from the archive makers or the original publishers of the materials, why isn't the NWU going after these publishers.
Even after the recent Tasini decision, I noticed that the New York Times is still selling archives articles off of its website. These are articles dating from 1996. Unless they have secured rights to all of these articles from the authors, can they still be doing this? Received on Wed Oct 18 2000 - 16:54:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:41 GMT