CNI-COPYRIGHT by thread

SubjectAuthor Date
imitation is the best form of flatteryEric EldredSat Jun 30 2001 - 15:00:52 GMT
ECMS-DefinitionWerner GunglSat Jun 30 2001 - 09:33:04 GMT
Breach of license agreement same as copyright Infringement?John LeslieFri Jun 29 2001 - 16:31:32 GMT
Were titles ever copyright-protected?Dodi SchultzFri Jun 29 2001 - 14:15:58 GMT
Self-Archiving JSTOR OCR'd Retrospective PublicationsStevan HarnadFri Jun 29 2001 - 13:08:37 GMT
New York Times Co. v. Tasini / Libraries' viewDodi SchultzThu Jun 28 2001 - 19:24:09 GMT
Electronic rights licensesFriedman, JessicaThu Jun 28 2001 - 14:18:07 GMT
PubScience under threat (fwd)Stevan HarnadThu Jun 28 2001 - 12:15:35 GMT
New York Times Co. v. TasiniDodi SchultzWed Jun 27 2001 - 21:17:19 GMT
Re: New York Times Co. v. TasiniDenise NicholsonTue Jun 26 2001 - 10:51:53 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniRod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.Wed Jun 27 2001 - 11:04:29 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniMike BradleyThu Jun 28 2001 - 06:10:01 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniRobert A. BaronFri Jun 29 2001 - 04:21:52 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniRebecca TushnetFri Jun 29 2001 - 04:52:26 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniMike BradleyMon Jul 02 2001 - 05:49:35 GMT
--> Re: New York Times Co. v. TasiniShelly WarwickSat Jun 30 2001 - 06:29:36 GMT
--> Re: New York Times Co. v. TasiniFreya AndersonMon Jul 02 2001 - 17:59:41 GMT
Re: New York Times Co. v. TasiniPatrice A. LyonsTue Jun 26 2001 - 22:34:41 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniRod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.Wed Jun 27 2001 - 10:49:35 GMT
--> Re: New York Times Co. v. TasiniJohn NobleWed Jun 27 2001 - 17:20:49 GMT
RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniCochran, WesWed Jun 27 2001 - 14:03:59 GMT
RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniPatrice A. LyonsThu Jun 28 2001 - 15:29:57 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniTerry CarrollSat Jun 30 2001 - 00:11:27 GMT
RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniRod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.Fri Jun 29 2001 - 03:12:47 GMT
RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniTyler OchoaFri Jun 29 2001 - 18:18:48 GMT
RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniTyler OchoaFri Jun 29 2001 - 18:35:08 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniJohn NobleSun Jul 01 2001 - 21:39:15 GMT
RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniTyler OchoaMon Jul 02 2001 - 18:07:23 GMT
Swiss say: put 1996 WIPO digital copyright treaty into WTO TRIPS accord]James LoveWed Jun 27 2001 - 17:58:44 GMT
Re: treaty v. statuteSteven D. JamarWed Jun 27 2001 - 03:01:54 GMT
Re: treaty v. statuteJames LoveWed Jun 27 2001 - 11:24:55 GMT
Re: treaty v. statuteThomas WorkmanWed Jun 27 2001 - 22:18:59 GMT
--> Re: treaty v. statuteBruce E. HaydenWed Jul 11 2001 - 00:51:24 GMT
The Internet and licensing/copyright infringementDavid AmmermanTue Jun 26 2001 - 23:19:51 GMT
RE: The Internet and licensing/copyright infringementHarold FederowWed Jun 27 2001 - 16:24:16 GMT
Re: The Internet and licensing/copyright infringementJohn NobleWed Jun 27 2001 - 19:45:16 GMT
RE: The Internet and licensing/copyright infringementTyler OchoaThu Jun 28 2001 - 18:04:12 GMT
Publisher's websiteMonica JohnsonTue Jun 26 2001 - 18:22:26 GMT
RE: Publisher's websiteDan McGuireWed Jun 27 2001 - 15:48:42 GMT
Re: Publisher's websiteRich StimWed Jun 27 2001 - 17:20:11 GMT
RE: Publisher's websiteRosemary TalabWed Jun 27 2001 - 17:41:31 GMT
European Directive on Harmonization of CopyrightNINCH-ANNOUNCETue Jun 26 2001 - 15:14:17 GMT
TasiniJoseph P. BauerTue Jun 26 2001 - 13:48:40 GMT
Re: TasiniJohn NobleWed Jun 27 2001 - 18:44:38 GMT
WWW enhancements as copyright violationsRichards, Edward P.Tue Jun 26 2001 - 13:33:05 GMT
Re: WWW enhancements as copyright violationsSaundra Kae RubelSat Jun 30 2001 - 22:55:11 GMT
(no subject)lakota ramseyTue Jun 26 2001 - 07:49:51 GMT
Tasini vs New York TimesTherese HofbauerTue Jun 26 2001 - 08:14:59 GMT
New York Times Co. v. TasiniTyler OchoaMon Jun 25 2001 - 18:55:21 GMT
RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniRod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.Tue Jun 26 2001 - 11:11:28 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniRebecca TushnetThu Jun 28 2001 - 04:33:44 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniMike BradleyThu Jun 28 2001 - 15:38:39 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniRebecca TushnetSat Jun 30 2001 - 04:36:11 GMT
--> Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?Barry CaplanThu Jun 28 2001 - 15:38:41 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?Cem KanerFri Jun 29 2001 - 04:37:34 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?Thomas WorkmanMon Jul 02 2001 - 22:28:22 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?T. G. McFaddenFri Jun 29 2001 - 12:38:50 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attackplagiarism?Seth JohnsonSun Jul 01 2001 - 18:39:17 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attackplagiarism?Thomas WorkmanTue Jul 03 2001 - 13:15:14 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?Tyler OchoaFri Jun 29 2001 - 18:02:45 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?Nancy WillardSun Jul 01 2001 - 17:56:18 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?Barry CaplanSun Jul 01 2001 - 20:46:08 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?- more on turnitin.comBarry CaplanSun Jul 01 2001 - 23:26:33 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?-more on turnitin.comNancy WillardTue Jul 03 2001 - 14:40:23 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?-more on turnitin.comJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jul 06 2001 - 00:13:33 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?-more on turnitin.comThomas WorkmanFri Jul 06 2001 - 13:29:57 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?-more on turnitin.comJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jul 13 2001 - 00:12:14 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attackplagiarism?-more on turnitin.comNancy WillardFri Jul 06 2001 - 16:33:42 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attackplagiarism?-more on turnitin.comJoseph Pietro RioloThu Jul 12 2001 - 23:52:12 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attackplagiarism?-more on turnitin.comThomas WorkmanFri Jul 13 2001 - 14:33:16 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attackplagiarism?-more on turnitin.comLarry ApplemanFri Jul 13 2001 - 17:32:04 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attackplagiarism?-more on turnitin.comJoseph Pietro RioloMon Jul 16 2001 - 23:06:08 GMT
--> Why Can't Johnny Respect Copyrights?Nancy WillardTue Jul 17 2001 - 17:51:30 GMT
--> Re: Why Can't Johnny Respect Copyrights?Carol SimpsonWed Jul 18 2001 - 19:34:32 GMT
--> RE: Why Can't Johnny Respect Copyrights?Jason ThomasWed Jul 18 2001 - 21:44:37 GMT
--> RE: Why Can't Johnny Respect Copyrights?Mike BradleyThu Jul 19 2001 - 18:55:57 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?John R. AllsionSun Jul 01 2001 - 21:16:21 GMT
--> RE: New York Times Co. v. TasiniJohn NobleThu Jun 28 2001 - 16:38:29 GMT
--> Microsoft's Copyright do forclose that they are a MonopolyBryan TaylorThu Jun 28 2001 - 19:46:48 GMT
--> Re: Microsoft's CopyrightJohn NobleFri Jun 29 2001 - 19:22:32 GMT
Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?Nancy WillardFri Jun 29 2001 - 16:39:04 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?John R. AllsionSun Jul 01 2001 - 21:08:49 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?Cem KanerTue Jul 03 2001 - 08:05:35 GMT
--> Re: Are schools violating copyright in order to attack plagiarism?Thomas WorkmanTue Jul 03 2001 - 13:27:06 GMT
Re: Ex Post Facto (Was: James Joyce (Ulysses film))Tyler OchoaMon Jun 25 2001 - 17:52:49 GMT
TasiniFrawley, Alfred C.Mon Jun 25 2001 - 16:05:12 GMT
Term of UK moral rights (was Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film))Mike HoldernessMon Jun 25 2001 - 14:04:50 GMT
RE: Term of UK moral rights (was Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film))Timothy Arnold-MooreThu Jun 28 2001 - 07:31:35 GMT
Re: Term of UK moral rights (was Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film))Peter GrovesFri Jun 29 2001 - 09:22:02 GMT
Legal Questions of Multimedia and the Internet in Schools and Universities (Germany)Markus JunkerMon Jun 25 2001 - 08:57:18 GMT
Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formDodi SchultzSun Jun 24 2001 - 21:18:30 GMT
Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formTyler OchoaWed Jun 20 2001 - 18:08:10 GMT
--> Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formRobert ApgoodThu Jun 21 2001 - 04:43:07 GMT
--> Fonts in State DocumentsGreg ErkinsTue Aug 28 2001 - 02:50:45 GMT
--> RE: Fonts in State DocumentsHarold FederowTue Aug 28 2001 - 21:38:29 GMT
--> Re: Fonts in State DocumentsDoug IsenbergTue Aug 28 2001 - 21:48:33 GMT
--> Re: Fonts in State DocumentsKarsten M. SelfWed Aug 29 2001 - 23:50:34 GMT
--> RE: Fonts in State DocumentsGreg ErkinsFri Aug 31 2001 - 06:08:29 GMT
--> RE: Fonts in State DocumentsRichards, Edward P.Tue Aug 28 2001 - 21:51:14 GMT
--> Re: Fonts in State DocumentsSanDiego-BooksThu Aug 30 2001 - 01:39:56 GMT
--> RE: Fonts in State DocumentsDavid HaleWed Aug 29 2001 - 12:32:08 GMT
--> Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formPeter D. JungerThu Jun 21 2001 - 08:50:21 GMT
--> Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formVance R. KovenThu Jun 21 2001 - 11:02:46 GMT
--> Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formPeter GrovesFri Jun 22 2001 - 08:43:06 GMT
--> Registration (Was: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb form)John R. AllsionSun Jun 24 2001 - 19:19:21 GMT
--> Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formJohn Mark OckerbloomMon Jun 25 2001 - 21:17:14 GMT
Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formKevin GriersonThu Jun 21 2001 - 12:38:06 GMT
RE: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formMichael LeventhalThu Jun 21 2001 - 16:46:45 GMT
--> Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formRoland ColeFri Jun 22 2001 - 21:22:57 GMT
--> Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formbob.rotstein[_at_]gte.netSat Jun 23 2001 - 14:59:30 GMT
--> Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formPeter D. JungerMon Jun 25 2001 - 00:09:16 GMT
Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formTyler OchoaThu Jun 21 2001 - 17:55:11 GMT
RE: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formKevin GriersonFri Jun 22 2001 - 12:39:02 GMT
--> RE: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formTerry CarrollMon Jun 25 2001 - 00:40:16 GMT
--> RE: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formJoseph Pietro RioloWed Jun 27 2001 - 02:22:28 GMT
RE: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formTyler OchoaFri Jun 22 2001 - 18:28:20 GMT
Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formLarry ApplemanTue Jun 26 2001 - 13:27:54 GMT
EU Copyright Directive publishedMarkus JunkerSat Jun 23 2001 - 09:28:59 GMT
Canadian Government to Modernize Copyright Legislation -- News ReleaseCouchman.Bruce[_at_]ic.gc.caFri Jun 22 2001 - 21:12:38 GMT
Re: Canadian Government to Modernize Copyright Legislation -- News ReleaseJeroen HellingmanSun Jun 24 2001 - 20:27:33 GMT
Re: Coypright Restoration (Was: James Joyce (Ulysses film))Tyler OchoaFri Jun 22 2001 - 19:15:40 GMT
Re: Coypright Restoration (Was: James Joyce (Ulysses film))Terry CarrollMon Jun 25 2001 - 00:52:17 GMT
Re: Coypright Restoration (Was: James Joyce (Ulysses film))John NobleTue Jun 26 2001 - 03:10:48 GMT
Re: Coypright Restoration (Was: James Joyce (Ulysses film))Tyler OchoaTue Jun 26 2001 - 19:49:37 GMT
--> Re: Coypright Restoration (Was: James Joyce (Ulysses film))John NobleWed Jun 27 2001 - 16:27:31 GMT
Re: Coypright Restoration (Was: James Joyce (Ulysses film))Tyler OchoaThu Jun 28 2001 - 17:58:55 GMT
--> Re: Coypright Restoration (Was: James Joyce (Ulysses film))John NobleFri Jun 29 2001 - 18:58:18 GMT
Re: Coypright Restoration (Was: James Joyce (Ulysses film))Tyler OchoaTue Jul 03 2001 - 17:44:18 GMT
Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formDodi SchultzFri Jun 22 2001 - 16:07:26 GMT
Re: Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formLawrence D.W. GravesMon Jun 25 2001 - 12:05:56 GMT
extent of licenseGlenn L. WebbFri Jun 22 2001 - 16:35:56 GMT
DMCA reportTerry CarrollThu Jun 21 2001 - 17:43:49 GMT
RE: DMCA reportSteve SmithFri Jun 22 2001 - 09:22:56 GMT
RE: DMCA reportSeth GreensteinFri Jun 22 2001 - 11:37:13 GMT
Re: DMCA reportChris MohrFri Jun 22 2001 - 14:20:00 GMT
Fees for interior design licensingFriedman, JessicaThu Jun 21 2001 - 15:41:18 GMT
Re: Fees for interior design licensingChris MohrFri Jun 22 2001 - 14:18:07 GMT
[Fwd: Selected Press Freedom reports on Hague Member Countries (fwd)]Seth JohnsonThu Jun 21 2001 - 06:22:24 GMT
InfoWorld article on XMCLMichael DodsonWed Jun 20 2001 - 21:14:54 GMT
licensing language in paper publicationsRobert A. BaronWed Jun 20 2001 - 13:41:10 GMT
Re: licensing language in paper publicationsBernard KatzThu Jun 21 2001 - 05:52:19 GMT
Re: licensing language in paper publicationsTyler OchoaFri Jun 22 2001 - 18:46:06 GMT
(To:Menno de Vries) re Registering a design in SpainPBallou[_at_]aol.comWed Jun 20 2001 - 12:56:50 GMT
Hague Diplomatic Conference ends, Badly for nowJames LoveWed Jun 20 2001 - 09:25:37 GMT
EU Copyright Directive, Directive 2001/29/ECCouchman.Bruce[_at_]ic.gc.caTue Jun 19 2001 - 14:52:40 GMT
James Joyce (Ulysses film)AlanKabat[_at_]aol.comTue Jun 19 2001 - 14:44:05 GMT
Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Tyler OchoaWed Jun 20 2001 - 18:33:50 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Peter GrovesThu Jun 21 2001 - 17:09:35 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Robert A. BaronFri Jun 22 2001 - 00:34:57 GMT
--> Restoration of copyright (Was Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film))Eric EldredFri Jun 22 2001 - 15:05:02 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Thomas WorkmanFri Jun 22 2001 - 15:56:36 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Peter D. JungerSun Jun 24 2001 - 23:58:38 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Dot and JimMon Jun 25 2001 - 02:04:12 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Vance R. KovenMon Jun 25 2001 - 14:44:02 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Dot and JimFri Jun 22 2001 - 21:30:50 GMT
Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Kevin GriersonFri Jun 22 2001 - 12:37:16 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Peter GrovesMon Jun 25 2001 - 09:38:19 GMT
RE: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Richards, Edward P.Fri Jun 22 2001 - 14:09:58 GMT
RE: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Richards, Edward P.Sun Jun 24 2001 - 23:37:48 GMT
Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Kevin GriersonTue Jun 26 2001 - 13:43:13 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Peter D. JungerWed Jun 27 2001 - 12:13:04 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Peter D. JungerThu Jun 28 2001 - 12:29:36 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Vance R. KovenThu Jun 28 2001 - 11:51:48 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Peter D. JungerFri Jun 29 2001 - 11:23:24 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Vance R. KovenMon Jul 02 2001 - 13:17:33 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Robert A. BaronThu Jun 28 2001 - 12:04:30 GMT
Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Tyler OchoaThu Jun 28 2001 - 18:09:02 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Peter D. JungerFri Jun 29 2001 - 11:27:57 GMT
--> Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Thomas WorkmanFri Jun 29 2001 - 22:10:48 GMT
Re: James Joyce (Ulysses film)Tyler OchoaMon Jul 02 2001 - 18:24:38 GMT
Trademarking a band namesd'auria[_at_]sterlingpub.comTue Jun 19 2001 - 13:28:25 GMT
Re: Trademarking a band nameIvan HoffmanWed Jun 20 2001 - 11:56:01 GMT
Re: Trademarking a band nameRwstim[_at_]aol.comWed Jun 20 2001 - 18:00:54 GMT
RE: Trademarking a band nameHenslee, WilliamWed Jun 20 2001 - 18:14:13 GMT
Re: Trademarking a band nameThomas WorkmanWed Jun 20 2001 - 18:19:49 GMT
RE: Editors and Joint Authorship [was: the purpose of law reviews ]Friedman, JessicaMon Jun 18 2001 - 14:44:17 GMT
Re: Editors and Joint Authorship [was: the purpose of law reviews ]Eric EldredTue Jun 19 2001 - 16:27:19 GMT
RE: Editors and Joint Authorship [was: the purpose of law reviews ]Friedman, JessicaWed Jun 20 2001 - 15:11:24 GMT
Registering a design in SpainMenno de VriesMon Jun 18 2001 - 13:45:00 GMT
Re: Registering a design in SpainAlexander WeirTue Jun 19 2001 - 07:00:55 GMT
Re: Registering a design in SpainmARIO mARQUESTue Jun 19 2001 - 07:31:07 GMT
Print on CanvasCATHERINE A GOREMon Jun 18 2001 - 04:14:13 GMT
Re: Editors and Joint Authorship [was: the purpose of law reviews]Tyler OchoaFri Jun 15 2001 - 16:47:24 GMT
June 18 NYC Discussion on Right to PublicityStephen Filler, Esq.Fri Jun 15 2001 - 13:46:34 GMT
Intellectual Property of a Drawing.PhilMcNear[_at_]aol.comThu Jun 14 2001 - 03:47:13 GMT
Re: Intellectual Property of a Drawing.Chris MohrThu Jun 14 2001 - 16:00:34 GMT
The DMCA's chilling effect on "hacking" discussionsLee LauWed Jun 13 2001 - 20:13:08 GMT
Re: The DMCA's chilling effect on "hacking" discussionsRoy MurphyThu Jun 14 2001 - 21:38:00 GMT
Copyright as limiting expressionDodi SchultzWed Jun 13 2001 - 16:30:24 GMT
Re: Copyright as limiting expressionTyler OchoaWed Jun 13 2001 - 18:47:48 GMT
--> Re: Copyright as limiting expressionSimonThu Jun 14 2001 - 12:39:37 GMT
--> Re: Copyright as limiting expressionEric EldredThu Jun 14 2001 - 13:22:52 GMT
Re: Copyright as limiting expressionTyler OchoaFri Jun 15 2001 - 16:29:49 GMT
--> Re: Copyright as limiting expressionEric EldredMon Jun 18 2001 - 16:49:16 GMT
Verbing a noun; even one that already has a verb formRoland ColeFri Jun 15 2001 - 22:18:34 GMT
INDIA TELECOM NEWSLETTER - Special Issueindnews[_at_]vsnl.netWed Jun 13 2001 - 15:05:40 GMT
permission to use samples of audiovisual speeches/interviewsBurt AltmanWed Jun 13 2001 - 12:48:41 GMT
Essay contest counter-WIPOEric EldredTue Jun 12 2001 - 21:28:00 GMT
Re: Essay contest counter-WIPOLee MarshallWed Jun 13 2001 - 11:35:07 GMT
--> RE: Essay contest counter-WIPODavid BasskinThu Jul 19 2001 - 23:27:21 GMT
--> RE: Essay contest counter-WIPOLee MarshallFri Jul 20 2001 - 09:54:32 GMT
listservs and requests for content deletionAlbert HendersonMon Jun 11 2001 - 21:26:49 GMT
Class action copyright suitsheald[_at_]arches.uga.eduMon Jun 11 2001 - 14:51:08 GMT
Re: Class action copyright suitsIrvin MuchnickTue Jun 12 2001 - 05:01:55 GMT
RE: Class action copyright suitsDavid HaleTue Jun 12 2001 - 12:20:00 GMT
Re: Class action copyright suitsJohn NobleTue Jun 12 2001 - 15:32:59 GMT
Re: Class action copyright suitsTyler OchoaTue Jun 12 2001 - 18:22:45 GMT
Re: Class action copyright suitsShelly WarwickWed Jun 13 2001 - 01:41:27 GMT
--> Re: Class action copyright suitsBryan TaylorWed Jun 13 2001 - 14:50:46 GMT
Microsoft's Smart-Tags: Unauthorized Derivitve WorkBryan TaylorSat Jun 09 2001 - 16:59:40 GMT
Re: Microsoft's Smart-Tags: Unauthorized Derivitve WorkTerry CarrollMon Jun 11 2001 - 18:55:50 GMT
Who owns an application that was created for a client without a contract?David MerinoSat Jun 09 2001 - 06:00:37 GMT
Re: Who owns an application that was created for a client without a contract?Tyler OchoaTue Jun 12 2001 - 18:30:42 GMT
American Library Association letter on Hague ConventionJames LoveFri Jun 08 2001 - 22:34:04 GMT
Version 37, Scholarly Electronic Publishing BibliographyCharles W. Bailey, Jr.Fri Jun 08 2001 - 17:38:19 GMT
RE: Cuban writersDavid HaleFri Jun 08 2001 - 14:02:23 GMT
RE: Cuban writersTheodora MichaelsTue Jun 12 2001 - 16:32:02 GMT
listservs and requests for content deletionJQ JohnsonFri Jun 08 2001 - 13:36:54 GMT
Re: Self-archiving downstream and the lesson of DOUBLE FOLDAlbert HendersonThu Jun 07 2001 - 22:20:31 GMT
Re: Self-archiving downstream and the lesson of DOUBLE FOLDRoberto RossSat Jun 09 2001 - 16:12:57 GMT
Job OpeningCarl JohnsonThu Jun 14 2001 - 20:22:01 GMT
Derivative worksEarl H. MerryThu Jun 07 2001 - 20:08:59 GMT
Re: Derivative worksTyler OchoaFri Jun 08 2001 - 19:10:56 GMT
Re: Cuban writersTheodora MichaelsThu Jun 07 2001 - 16:11:35 GMT
Re: Cuban writersWolfetone5[_at_]aol.comFri Jun 08 2001 - 14:55:03 GMT
purpose of law reviewsMeekoosh40[_at_]aol.comThu Jun 07 2001 - 13:55:03 GMT
Re: purpose of law reviewsDRoe2Fri Jun 08 2001 - 17:23:20 GMT
copyright in "scene"Howard G. ZaharoffThu Jun 07 2001 - 12:49:39 GMT
Re: copyright in "scene"John NobleFri Jun 08 2001 - 09:19:08 GMT
Re: copyright in "scene"Tyler OchoaFri Jun 08 2001 - 19:18:10 GMT
Re: Self-archiving downstream and the response Harnad buriedPeter MacinnisWed Jun 06 2001 - 09:56:06 GMT
Copyrights and CopywrongsJQ JohnsonTue Jun 05 2001 - 17:25:44 GMT
Re: Deleting Preprints (was PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs)Albert HendersonMon Jun 04 2001 - 21:35:06 GMT
Hague Convention: what you should knowJames LoveSun Jun 03 2001 - 02:17:38 GMT
The Six Roads to Liberating the Refereed LiteratureStevan HarnadFri Jun 01 2001 - 15:15:08 GMT
Re: The Six Roads to Liberating the Refereed LiteratureBryan TaylorSun Jun 03 2001 - 07:23:57 GMT
Re: The Six Roads to Liberating the Refereed Literaturenoring[_at_]olagrande.netMon Jun 04 2001 - 13:59:52 GMT
RE: the purpose of law reviews?Richards, Edward P.Fri Jun 01 2001 - 15:44:23 GMT
RE: the purpose of law reviews?LegalMillSun Jun 03 2001 - 02:41:50 GMT
Re: the purpose of law reviews?Earl H. MerryFri Jun 01 2001 - 16:48:15 GMT
Re: the purpose of law reviews?Greg LastowkaFri Jun 01 2001 - 16:54:45 GMT
RE: the purpose of law reviews?David HaleFri Jun 01 2001 - 17:11:47 GMT
Re: the purpose of law reviews?'early[_at_]eastcore.net'Fri Jun 01 2001 - 21:31:41 GMT
Re: the purpose of law reviews?Peter D. JungerFri Jun 01 2001 - 17:25:25 GMT
Re: the purpose of law reviews?John NobleFri Jun 01 2001 - 18:04:33 GMT
Re: the purpose of law reviews?Greg LastowkaTue Jun 05 2001 - 13:47:30 GMT
--> Re: the purpose of law reviews?Bruce E. HaydenTue Jun 12 2001 - 18:02:05 GMT
--> Re: the purpose of law reviews?Greg LastowkaThu Jun 14 2001 - 16:22:21 GMT
RE: the purpose of law reviews?Richards, Edward P.Tue Jun 05 2001 - 02:29:16 GMT
Re: the purpose of law reviews?Carol A. KunzeTue Jun 05 2001 - 13:15:15 GMT
RE: the purpose of law reviews?Anne Marie HawkinsTue Jun 05 2001 - 17:07:37 GMT
RE: the purpose of law reviews?David HaleWed Jun 06 2001 - 13:04:03 GMT
RE: the purpose of law reviews?Thomas WorkmanThu Jun 07 2001 - 17:57:36 GMT
--> Re: the purpose of law reviews?Peter D. JungerFri Jun 08 2001 - 17:21:14 GMT
--> Re: the purpose of law reviews?Thomas WorkmanMon Jun 11 2001 - 22:03:28 GMT
RE: the purpose of law reviews?Kevin GriersonWed Jun 06 2001 - 17:00:43 GMT
RE: the purpose of law reviews?Nick ZalesThu Jun 07 2001 - 02:34:13 GMT
RE: the purpose of law reviews?Joyce, CraigThu Jun 07 2001 - 05:44:54 GMT
Re: the purpose of law reviews?Kevin GriersonMon Jun 11 2001 - 12:41:42 GMT
Re: the purpose of law reviews?Peter D. JungerTue Jun 12 2001 - 13:35:54 GMT
Re: the purpose of law reviews?Laurie UrquiagaFri Jun 15 2001 - 16:50:26 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchStevan HarnadFri Jun 01 2001 - 11:02:44 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchSteve HitchcockFri Jun 01 2001 - 09:41:32 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchGeorge ValpakFri Jun 01 2001 - 17:08:08 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchShelly WarwickTue Jun 05 2001 - 00:43:37 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchAlbert HendersonMon Jun 04 2001 - 21:35:04 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchAlbert HendersonTue Jun 05 2001 - 22:25:20 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchAlbert HendersonTue Jun 05 2001 - 22:25:21 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchGeorge ValpakWed Jun 06 2001 - 16:38:44 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchAlbert HendersonWed Jun 06 2001 - 10:23:34 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchAlbert HendersonThu Jun 07 2001 - 09:27:15 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchGeorge ValpakFri Jun 08 2001 - 14:49:16 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchPeter D. JungerFri Jun 08 2001 - 17:05:23 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchAlbert HendersonMon Jun 11 2001 - 21:26:50 GMT
Senate Passes a Bill Extending Copyright Exemption to Online CoursesEric SchnellTue Jun 12 2001 - 12:24:50 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchGeorge ValpakFri Jun 15 2001 - 14:01:16 GMT
--> Copyrights and "new technology"Doug IsenbergMon Jun 18 2001 - 19:13:28 GMT
--> Re: Copyrights and "new technology"Ralph CliffordTue Jun 19 2001 - 12:44:26 GMT
--> eu copyright directiveTherese HofbauerThu Jun 21 2001 - 10:20:30 GMT
--> Re: Copyrights and "new technology"Roland ColeTue Jun 19 2001 - 21:02:34 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchAlbert HendersonMon Jun 18 2001 - 20:53:17 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchGeorge ValpakTue Jun 19 2001 - 16:11:17 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchAlbert HendersonWed Jun 20 2001 - 20:44:39 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchGeorge ValpakFri Jun 22 2001 - 06:25:21 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchAlbert HendersonTue Jun 26 2001 - 01:40:23 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchGeorge ValpakWed Jun 27 2001 - 06:00:19 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchKevin GriersonWed Jul 24 2002 - 13:09:01 GMT
Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?Tyler OchoaFri Jun 01 2001 - 23:56:28 GMT
Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?Howard LurieTue Jun 05 2001 - 15:46:25 GMT
Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?Eric EldredWed Jun 06 2001 - 17:41:56 GMT
--> Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?Dot and JimThu Jun 07 2001 - 14:24:08 GMT
Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?Tyler OchoaWed Jun 06 2001 - 19:00:07 GMT
RE: Is a sequel a derivative work?Smith, RobertThu Jun 07 2001 - 12:54:10 GMT
Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?lpickering[_at_]lowenstein.comThu Jun 07 2001 - 14:30:05 GMT
Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?Tyler OchoaThu Jun 07 2001 - 20:52:21 GMT
Pay-per-view (Was: Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?)Eric EldredFri Jun 08 2001 - 17:39:11 GMT
--> Re: Pay-per-view (Was: Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?)Joseph Pietro RioloMon Jul 09 2001 - 23:10:57 GMT
--> Re: Pay-per-view (Was: Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?)Laurie UrquiagaTue Jul 10 2001 - 18:05:56 GMT
--> Re: Pay-per-view (Was: Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?)Joseph Pietro RioloThu Jul 12 2001 - 00:36:36 GMT
--> Re: Pay-per-view (Was: Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?)Laurie UrquiagaThu Jul 12 2001 - 18:36:12 GMT
--> Re: Pay-per-view (Was: Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?)Joseph Pietro RioloMon Jul 16 2001 - 23:07:35 GMT
Re: Is a sequel a derivative work?Tyler OchoaFri Jun 08 2001 - 18:41:36 GMT
Re: Copyright QuestionCharles McGarryFri Jun 01 2001 - 14:07:58 GMT
Re: a QuestionJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jun 15 2001 - 00:16:11 GMT
Re: a QuestionThomas WorkmanFri Jun 15 2001 - 17:33:00 GMT
--> Re: a QuestionJim BeasleyMon Jun 18 2001 - 18:04:33 GMT
--> Re: a QuestionThomas WorkmanTue Jun 19 2001 - 15:05:06 GMT
--> Re: a QuestionJoseph Pietro RioloSat Jun 30 2001 - 23:27:01 GMT
RE: a QuestionWilson, DarrylTue Jun 19 2001 - 15:27:48 GMT
RE: a QuestionTerry CarrollWed Jun 20 2001 - 06:53:44 GMT
Re: a QuestionTyler OchoaWed Jun 20 2001 - 18:24:41 GMT
RE: a QuestionWilson, DarrylThu Jun 21 2001 - 21:19:46 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away Research (fwd)Albert HendersonFri Jun 01 2001 - 11:25:09 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchNancy WillardFri Jun 01 2001 - 16:37:10 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchStevan HarnadFri Jun 22 2001 - 10:38:49 GMT
Re: PostGutenberg Copyrights and Wrongs for Give-Away ResearchStevan HarnadFri Jun 22 2001 - 15:29:46 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsJoseph Pietro RioloSun Jun 10 2001 - 13:34:34 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsPaulaTue Jun 12 2001 - 16:30:55 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsJonMEsq[_at_]aol.comThu May 31 2001 - 13:51:37 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsStephen FishmanFri Jun 01 2001 - 06:55:03 GMT
RE: Website RegistrationsFriedman, JessicaFri Jun 01 2001 - 14:07:36 GMT
RE: Website RegistrationsSue MunseyFri Jun 01 2001 - 16:45:21 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsLinda GruberTue Jun 12 2001 - 09:21:59 GMT
RE: Website RegistrationsFriedman, JessicaWed Jun 13 2001 - 14:01:34 GMT
RE: Website RegistrationsVance R. KovenThu Jun 14 2001 - 11:57:45 GMT
RE: Website RegistrationsJoseph Pietro RioloThu Jun 14 2001 - 23:56:49 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsTyler OchoaWed Jun 13 2001 - 19:01:42 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsStephen FishmanThu Jun 14 2001 - 06:19:22 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsVance R. KovenThu Jun 14 2001 - 11:49:17 GMT
--> Re: Website RegistrationsGreg LastowkaFri Jun 15 2001 - 14:22:55 GMT
--> Re: Website RegistrationsVance R. KovenMon Jun 18 2001 - 12:47:37 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsJoseph Pietro RioloFri Jun 15 2001 - 00:05:26 GMT
--> Re: Website RegistrationsStephen FishmanFri Jun 15 2001 - 23:17:54 GMT
Website as publicationRoland ColeFri Jun 15 2001 - 22:15:41 GMT
RE: Website RegistrationsTyler OchoaThu Jun 14 2001 - 21:03:14 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsBrian NeginSun Jun 17 2001 - 10:58:19 GMT
RE: Website RegistrationsFriedman, JessicaFri Jun 15 2001 - 13:51:03 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsTyler OchoaFri Jun 15 2001 - 16:57:13 GMT
RE: Website RegistrationsLinda GruberSun Jun 17 2001 - 06:44:34 GMT
RE: Website RegistrationsVance R. KovenMon Jun 18 2001 - 13:58:43 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsRoberto RossTue Jun 19 2001 - 18:38:46 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsVance R. KovenWed Jun 20 2001 - 11:32:19 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsThomas WorkmanWed Jun 20 2001 - 18:41:42 GMT
Re: Website RegistrationsRoberto RossThu Jun 21 2001 - 13:58:09 GMT
Harry Potter suitFreya AndersonTue Jun 05 2001 - 17:15:30 GMT
Re: Harry Potter suitJoseph Pietro RioloThu Jun 07 2001 - 23:46:20 GMT
--> Re: Harry Potter suitFreya AndersonFri Jun 08 2001 - 17:54:48 GMT
Re: Copyrighted Clothing?Jim BeasleyFri Jun 01 2001 - 11:43:14 GMT
Re: ideas help??David BozakMon Jun 04 2001 - 16:25:36 GMT
Re: ideas help??Sam THFri Jun 01 2001 - 07:37:45 GMT
Re: ideas help??Peter D. JungerFri Jun 01 2001 - 16:28:58 GMT
Proof that all Digital "data" is a "Program"Bryan TaylorSun Jun 03 2001 - 09:07:27 GMT
RE: Proof that all Digital "data" is a "Program"Richards, Edward P.Tue Jun 05 2001 - 02:26:00 GMT
Re: Proof that all Digital "data" is a "Program"Joseph Pietro RioloTue Jun 05 2001 - 23:07:12 GMT
--> Re: Proof that all Digital "data" is a "Program"Jeroen HellingmanWed Jun 06 2001 - 08:03:43 GMT
--> Re: Proof that all Digital "data" is a "Program"Sam THWed Jun 06 2001 - 23:07:10 GMT
RE: Proof that all Digital "data" is a "Program"Patrice A. LyonsFri Jun 08 2001 - 13:03:36 GMT
Copyright as limiting expressionSimonTue Jun 12 2001 - 06:23:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:36:03 GMT