RE: The origin of the "7 second rule"

From: Hoffmann, M. Gretchen <ghoffmann[_at_]fulbright.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:49:00 -0600


That's a great analogy! THanks for sharing it.

Gretchen McCord Hoffmann
Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP
ghoffmann[_at_]fulbright.com
512-536-5668



This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and any attachments.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster[_at_]fulbright.com

FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P.


-----Original Message-----
From: carol [mailto:carol[_at_]drogon.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:50 AM To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: RE: The origin of the "7 second rule"

I realize that this is kind of more back on the original question (which had to do with music sampling) but I run into similar questions all the time -- how much of XX piece of writing can I change and have it not be infringing? They think there's a percentage, usually.

I tell them to envision the Mona Lisa. Now, tell me what 10% of it is. They usually get the point.

Carol Cricow

-- 
Carol Busby Cricow
Attorney at Law
875 Country Club Road
Eugene, Oregon  97401
541-484-6860; fax: 541-687-1891
e-mail:  carol[_at_]drogon.com
Received on Mon Dec 10 2001 - 15:49:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:44 GMT