At 12:08 AM 12/12/01 -0800, Terry Carroll wrote:
>The basic operation of the proposed bills, like the set introduced last
>Congress, is to prohibit a state from asserting a patent, copyright or
>trademark, unless the state also waives its Eleventh Amendment immunity.
>The bill requires a waiver either before January 1, 2004 or before the
>commencement of infringement.
An interesting concept. Are there other statutes like this? I think this will add to the controversy over "unconstitutional conditions" attaching to the extension or exercise of a federal right. Could Congress prohibit states from owning or exercising IP at all?
*Vance R. Koven Counselor at Law * * Law Offices of Vance R. Koven * *20 Park Plaza, Suite 633 Boston, MA 02116 * *tel: 617-482-3852 fax: 617-482-4972 * * net: vrkoven[_at_]world.std.com * *********************************************************Received on Thu Dec 13 2001 - 13:52:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:44 GMT