Re: "Copymonopoly" instead of copyr* ?

From: <sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 01:14:04 -0500 (CDT)


Thank you for your answer, but it does not say who spoke for or against the copyright at the Constituitonal convention, no comment about it is readily available in any of the pampleteerings that were going on during the time. so.. In short, which louse put the damn copyright and patent clause in the constitution? That clause has imprisioned humanity to the few that control the law and no one seems to be able to say how patents and copyrights became a part of the constitution. sterling
On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Seth Johnson wrote:

>
> The exclusive rights clause.
>
> Seth Johnson
>
> sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com wrote:
> >
> > Yes, and it seems no one can tell the reason for or
> > the author of the copyRight and patent right clause
> > in the original unamended constitution.
> > sterling
>
>
Received on Tue Aug 06 2002 - 06:16:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:46 GMT