I just noticed HR 2724 IH, has anyone a strong take on this yet? it is interesting that the amendment notice to the Session suggest in the preamble that the purpose is to amend the USC 17 and then it says and for "other purposes".
I wonder is congress required to announce the other purposes? and could any of you suggest what the other purposes might be or mean?
sterling
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c107:2:./temp/~c107hpaZ3M:: Music Online Competition Act of 2001 (Introduced in House)
107th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2724
To amend title 17, United States Code, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE August 2, 2001
Mr. CANNON (for himself and Mr. BOUCHER) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL To amend title 17, United States Code, and for other purposes.
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 RCumbow[_at_]GrahamDunn.com wrote:
> It all depends on where the article came from, and what uses of the article
> are permitted under the license accompanying the database from which the
> article was extracted. I suspect that most database licenses would prohibit
> this sort of re-distribution.
>
> Robert C. Cumbow
> Graham & Dunn PC
> 1420 Fifth Avenue, 33rd Floor
> Seattle, WA 98101-2390
> direct 206.340.9619
> fax 206.340.9599
> rcumbow[_at_]grahamdunn.com
> http://www.grahamdunn.com
>
> Big law firm experience
> without the big law firm experienceŽ
Received on Tue Sep 17 2002 - 12:25:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:46 GMT