On Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:51 PM, Kevin Grierson
[SMTP:kgrierson[_at_]wilsav.com] wrote:
> I'm with Tyler, with one caveat: I don't think it's ever a good idea to
attempt to make a decision about a legal determination based on feedback
from a listserv, even one with obviously well-qualified participants. We
haven't seen the design, and we don't have an opportunity to ask relevant
background questions, the answers to which might change the analysis or
even moot it (if, for example, the Junior Mints folks were aware of the
plans and had threatened to sue, the decision about whether to proceed
would depend a lot on the school's willingness to litigate, even if they're
sure they're right).
>
> Find a lawyer and talk details. You may find an alumnus/alumna willing
to investigate for free, or even someone from this list (or the INTA
trademark list) who will do the work on a reduced fee or pro bono basis,
but don't rely on advice from a bunch of faceless posters who (as should be
evident by now) will treat the issue more as an academic exercise than as a
real life problem they have an obligation to solve.
>
> Kevin Grierson
>
> Kevin W. Grierson
> Willcox & Savage, P.C.
> 1800 Bank of America Center
> One Commercial Place
> Norfolk, Virginia 23510
>
> mailto:kgrierson[_at_]wilsav.com
> ph: 757/628-5603 fx: 757/628-5566
> http://www.wilsav.com
>
Isn't "always ask a lawyer before asking the rightsholder" just as
dangerous as "always ask the rightsholder"- except it ends up benefiting
lawyers rather than artists and authors?
Especially as most lawyers have one eye on possible negligence suits when
framing their advice....
Edward Barrow
New Media Copyright Consultant
http://www.copyweb.co.uk/
***Important: see http://www.copyweb.co.uk/email.htm for information
about the legal status of this email ***
Received on Fri Sep 27 2002 - 07:43:01 GMT