Joseph Riolo writes, in response to a message of mine generally supporting
the constitutionality of the CTEA:
>> Every year, there are many thousands of new writers and artists and
>> every year, they produce some hundred thousands of new copyrighted
>> works. As the number of works that still have valid copyright
>> increases, the chance that your copyrighted works will stand out
>> decreases.
Again, you are not in fact discussing the recent SCOTUS decision--which had to do with the constitutionality of Congress's enactment of the CTEA--but, rather, arguing against general extension of copyright term.
Your argument is not with SCOTUS or with anyone here; it's with Congress.
As to your statement above: As a midlist nonfiction writer, I'm not concerned with "standing out" aboug a hundred thousand new works, most of which are worthless. I'm concerned--because this is how I earn my living--with assuring that what I have created is paid for and that no one else profits unjustly and illegally from my efforts.
--DS Received on Mon Jan 27 2003 - 18:18:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:47 GMT