Re: click-wrap contracts and libraries

From: Tyler Ochoa <tochoa[_at_]law.whittier.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:54:37 -0800

>>> kgrierson[_at_]wilsav.com wrote:

> Before you go lending software to anyone, I would strongly suggest
> that you talk to an attorney and have him look at the licenses. The
> penalties for copyright infringement can be quite stiff.

Tyler T. Ochoa
Professor and Co-Director
Center for Intellectual Property Law
Whittier Law School
3333 Harbor Blvd.
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(714) 444-4141, ext. 243
(714) 444-1854 (fax)
tochoa[_at_]law.whittier.edu

>>> johnl[_at_]iecc.com 01/29/03 06:19PM >>> replied: But the guy asking the question is in California, not Virginia. Since California isn't a UCITA state, is there any reason to think that shrink-wrap licenses matter in California? Copyright is no bar to lending original legitimately purchased copies of software. Libraries do it all the time.
<<<<<

Your second sentence is incorrect. Although in general lending of copyrighted works is permitted by the first-sale doctrine codified in Section 109(a), there is an express exception prohibiting the lending of computer programs (and sound recordings) "for the purposes of direct or indirect commercial advantage" in Section 109(b)(1)(A). There are, of course, exceptions to the exception, including one for libraries: libraries are expressly permitted to lend software under Section 109(b)(2)(A), if they meet the conditions specified in the statute. Received on Thu Jan 30 2003 - 16:54:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:48 GMT