>I heard a story on NPR this morning regarding an
>artist who transposes photographic negatives onto
>leaves using the sun and the leaf's natural processes.
>So, this got me thinking about the case about
>tiles in New Mexico, and its counterpart in another
>circuit whose facts escape me, and the fact that what
>he is doing may be considered copyright infringment in
>certain parts of our fair country.
The cases you mention -- Mirage Editions, Inc. v. Albuquerque A.R.T. Co.,
856 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1988) and Lee v. Deck the Walls, Inc., 925 F.Supp.
576 (N.D. Ill. 1996) -- are not exactly on point.
In the Mirage case, pages from a Patrick Nagel book were mounted in frames
and sold separately. In Lee, notecards were mounted on tiles. In those
cases, copies were not made of the works. What was at issue was whether
the First Sale doctrine protected the uses; or alternatively, whether
isolating and mounting images amounted to creation of derivative works.
In the case of artist Binh Danh's leaves, copies are being made -- that
is, works are being reproduced in a different medium. I can't say with
any certainty how Binh Danh would do under a fair use analysis but his
artwork is clearly more transformative than either of the two previously
cited cases.
Rich Stim
Nolo.com
Received on Thu Jun 26 2003 - 00:18:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:49 GMT