On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Keith Tabor <ket354[_at_]yahoo.com> wrote:
>
I read the article in New York Daily News and the synopsis did not give away any big spoilers, in contrast to the claims in complaint. Also, the synopsis can easily fall under the Fair Use Doctrine. The claims in the complaint are really great exaggerations of "the sky is falling!"
> Besides, despite her arrogance, she has developed a
> product that is in high demand. If the literati don't
> respect her, the market certainly does.
You have a point.
Readers may be interested in an article by Lindsay Clydesdale that was posted to alt.fan.harry-potter. To find it, go to google.com, click on "Groups" tab, enter the following words in the box and click on the button:
Lindsay Clydesdale group:alt.fan.harry-potter
Joseph Pietro Riolo
<riolo[_at_]voicenet.com>
http://www.boycottcopyright.com
Number of days left until 1-1-2019 when all knowledge of 1923 in the land of the U.S.A. will be freed from their copyright owners' prisons: 5,668
Public domain notice: I put all of my expressions in this post in the public domain. Received on Thu Jun 26 2003 - 23:42:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:49 GMT