Re: Attribution is not required in public domain materials

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Keith Tabor <ket354[_at_]yahoo.com> wrote:

>

I have only one arrow left in my quiver and then, I will stop.

I have no problem understanding your description of the process of actualization or materialization. The problem is that just because a machine or process is patentable does not automatically mean that idea behind it is patentable or protectable. This fallacy is called "Fallacy of division" (see: http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html).

Joseph Pietro Riolo
<riolo[_at_]voicenet.com>
http://www.boycottcopyright.com

Number of days left until 1-1-2019 when all knowledge of 1923 in the land of the U.S.A. will be freed from their copyright owners' prisons: 5,664

Public domain notice: I put all of my expressions in this post in the public domain. Received on Mon Jun 30 2003 - 22:37:38 GMT