In 1991, the Supreme Court ruled in Feist vs. Rural Telephone Service
that copyright does not extend to data. That is, the "sweat of ones
brow" in assembling a database does not confer copyright protection to
the data itself -- copyright only covers how the data is tangibly
fixed and expressed. (I think I mostly explained that right.)
I vaguely recall that after Feist, Congress considered legislation to extend copyright protection to compilations of data. What is the current status of this? Was such a law enacted?
In addition, regarding this, what is the situation in England, Canada, Australia, and other countries in the world?
Thanks in advance.
Jon Noring Received on Mon Aug 25 2003 - 19:15:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:50 GMT