Re: Re: CNI- RESTORATION OF COPYRIGHT 104A

From: Calle Østergaard - Troll Company ApS <info[_at_]troll-company.dk>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 13:35:06 -0400

I am told the defendant raised the issue of unconstitutionality in restoring copyright once lost to the PD and cited the Graham v John Deere as authority. However the 5th spent little effort on the subject as seen in fn 33. Admitted I did not read the appellate brief yet thus relying upon verbal information.

Calle Østergaard

• Original Message ----- From: "Mike Holderness" <mch[_at_]cix.compulink.co.uk> To: "CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property" <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 6:15 PM Subject: [CNI-(C)] Re: CNI- RESTORATION OF COPYRIGHT 104A

> In-Reply-To: <list-1478367[_at_]cni.org>
> Calle Ostergaard wrote:
> > Seems the 5. Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the
> > Restoration Act ?
>
> I've read very many of the papers in the case and recall
> nothing about it being asked to rule on constitutionality.
>
> The major part of the case hinged on interpretation of
> "author" in Mexican laws (plural). Though the 80:20
> rule applies to the judgement...
>
> Mike
>
>
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
> the mailing list <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CNI-COPYRIGHT-off[_at_]cni.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-digest[_at_]cni.org>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-index[_at_]cni.org>
> To postpone your subscription, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-null[_at_]cni.org>
> Send administrative queries to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-request[_at_]cni.org>
>
> Visit the CNI-COPYRIGHT e-mail list archive at
<https://mail2.cni.org/Lists/CNI-COPYRIGHT/>.
>
>

---

> Denne mail er blevet scannet af http://www.virus112.com
>

---

>
>
>

---

> Denne mail er blevet scannet af http://www.virus112.com
>

---

Received on Mon Oct 06 2003 - 21:35:06 GMT