Re: Re: Kelly v. Arriba Soft (new opinion from 9thCir.)

From: Bryan Taylor <bryan_w_taylor[_at_]yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 15:15:40 -0400

> Here is where Keith misses the whole point of copyright. The problem is
> that there is NO QUALITY issue, because copying is EXACT. Hence, nobody is
> going to PAY for a work if they are legally allowed to get it for free.

I regularly pay for content I am legally allowed to get for free. I do this because I know that it is in my benefit to support creators. Red Hat is a $1 billion dollar company whose products can (mostly) be obtained for free. In fact, I believe many people are concsiously steering towards companies whose products are available for free and choosing only to pay such companies.



Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com Received on Thu Oct 09 2003 - 23:15:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:50 GMT