Re: Golan v. Ashcroft

David--

    Have you picked up new intelligence on Golan? Hope all is well.

    Mike

• Original Message ----- From: "David Carson" <daca[_at_]loc.gov> To: "Multiple recipients of list" <cni-copyright[_at_]cni.org> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:03 AM Subject: Re: Golan v. Ashcroft

> The complaint has been amended (post-Eldred), and continues to claim
> that term extension was unconstitutional! Perhaps the district court
> will overrule the Supreme Court.
>
> The CTEA claim appears to be slightly different than in Eldred; it seems
> to claim that life + 70 is not a "limited time."
>
> >>> jrfriedman59[_at_]yahoo.com 03/17/03 00:46 AM >>>
> Does anyone know where this case currently stands? Was
> the CTEA part of the complaint dismissed after the
> decision in Eldred? What about the complaint alleging
> that the URAA is unconstitutional?
>
> Jessica Friedman
>
> =====
> Jessica R. Friedman
> Attorney at Law
> 757 Third Avenue
> Suite 1903
> New York, New York 10017
> Phone: 212-973-9100
> Fax:`212-973-9101
>
>
Received on Wed Nov 12 2003 - 02:12:07 GMT