David Dailey writes,
>> When I read Amazon's announcement, I thought "Wow, what market clout >> Amazon must have to convince all those publishers to give them >> permission..." Others seem to have thought "what a nasty Amazon to >> so boldly infringe the copyrights of all those quaint publishers..."
> *What* copyrights of the publishers? You've overlooked a whole group here:
> the actual copyright owners. I.e., the authors.
Publishers are typically copyright owners too. A license in a copyright is also a property right.
> We're a little puzzled by
> Amazon's gimmick, but what concerns us is the publishers' so readily
> granting that permission and whether or not they've consulted with those
> who in fact own the rights.
One must look first to the contract/license that the author has with the publisher. That very well may grant such a right, and thus NOT violate the author's copyright. Not being party to such agreements, I cannot say what the standard is. However, I would guess that the publishers have some right (or think they do) to do what they have done in many, if not most, of these cases. Otherwise, I seriously doubt that their attorneys would have approved such a practice.
-Bodi. Received on Wed Nov 12 2003 - 02:12:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:50 GMT