| Author | Subject | Date |
| 'Timothy Arnold-Moore' |
| | RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD) |
| | RE: Re: The Grey Album | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| | RE: Peter Pan. | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT |
| | RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| | RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:19 GMT |
| | RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 19 2004 - 22:00:05 GMT |
| | RE: Re:legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 18:25:17 GMT |
| | RE: Re: CA: WMFH=employee | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:21:11 GMT |
| Baron, Robert (Phila) |
| | registering works containing trade secrets | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| Bob Warner |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT |
| Brock Shinen, Esq. |
| | Re: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| | Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT |
| | Publishing Catalog | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| | Re: Those Email Signatures | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 17:15:04 GMT |
| Calle Østergaard - Troll Company ApS |
| | Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| Carol Busby |
| | Contribution to a collective work | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 18:00:47 GMT |
| | Re: Re: University professors - work for hire | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:21:11 GMT |
| Carol Simpson |
| | Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Chris Mohr |
| | RE: Re: permission for screen shots | Fri Feb 06 2004 - 16:55:01 GMT |
| Chris Reed |
| | RE: Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Christine L. Sundt |
| | RE: Re: Publication through public display | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT |
| Conlon, Julie |
| | RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| | Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| David Bozak |
| | Re: Re: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"] | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 17:15:04 GMT |
| David Dailey |
| | Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| | Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT |
| | Questions concerning section 506(c) | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| | no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"] | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 18:00:47 GMT |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 22:20:27 GMT |
| | Re: University professors - work for hire | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:21:11 GMT |
| David P. Dillard |
| | [NetGold] FOLKLORE : ARTICLE : INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW: Traditional Knowledge 'In Peril' | Thu Feb 19 2004 - 22:00:05 GMT |
| | [NetGold] MICROSOFT : NEWS: Ruling Puts Microsoft's 'Windows' Trademark at Risk | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| | [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguided | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 17:15:04 GMT |
| David Post |
| | University professors - work for hire | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| DeMarte, Luke |
| | RE: Re: The Grey Album | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 21:45:29 GMT |
| Dodi Schultz |
| | Contribution to a collective work | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 21:05:15 GMT |
| Doug Isenberg |
| | Re: 321 Studios | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| Duhaime, Diane |
| | RE: Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Edward Barrow |
| | Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguided | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 18:55:05 GMT |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Elizabeth T. Russell |
| | Re: famous person's name | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT |
| Eric Von Vorys |
| | RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| | RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| ericgoldman[_at_]onebox.com |
| | RE: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission forscreen shots"] | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| Ethan Ackerman |
| | RE: Re: Decompiler service - Object code IS "protected" by copyright law | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT |
| | RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT |
| Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.org |
| | Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| Gregory Aharonian |
| | Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| Harold Federow |
| | RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | RE: Re: Those Email Signatures | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 14:50:12 GMT |
| | RE: Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of Trademark | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 14:50:12 GMT |
| Heather Vargas |
| | Re: Re: famous person's name | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 15:55:11 GMT |
| | Standard Technical Measures | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 15:55:11 GMT |
| Herb Coleman |
| | The law is interpreted | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT |
| I.R.Maturana |
| | RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| | RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| info[_at_]joybutler.com |
| | owner/authorship problem | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| Ivan Hoffman |
| | Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 17:25:36 GMT |
| | Re: University professors - work for hire | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| James Love |
| | April 5, 2004 - NYC - TACD workshop on Global Access to Essential Learning Tools | Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:20:02 GMT |
| Jessica R. Friedman |
| | RE: Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | Fri Feb 06 2004 - 22:15:02 GMT |
| | doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Jimmy Wales |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| jnoble[_at_]dgsys.com |
| | 321 Studios | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:19 GMT |
| | Re: owner/authorship problem | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| John Allison |
| | Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| John Eye |
| | permission for screen shots | Wed Feb 04 2004 - 20:10:43 GMT |
| John Hampton |
| | Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 15:55:12 GMT |
| John Levine |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| | Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 16:10:20 GMT |
| | Re: Termination rights, was Work For Hire Agreements | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements, termination | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| John Mitchell |
| | RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 22:11:05 GMT |
| | RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 21:45:44 GMT |
| | RE: 321 Studios | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| | RE: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| | RE: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| | RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 21:30:04 GMT |
| | RE: Those Email Signatures | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| Joseph Pietro Riolo |
| | Re: Questions concerning section 506(c) | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| JQ Johnson |
| | Re: University professors - work for hire | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| Kathleen Williamson |
| | Re: Re: 321 Studios | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT |
| | Re: Questions concerning section 506(c) | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| | owner/authorship problem | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:56:04 GMT |
| | owner/authorship problem | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:55:58 GMT |
| | famous person's name | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 15:55:12 GMT |
| Keith Tabor |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| | Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of Trademark | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT |
| | Re: Those Email Signatures | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT |
| | Re: owner/authorship problem | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| | Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | Fri Feb 06 2004 - 16:55:01 GMT |
| Kevin Grierson |
| | Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT |
| | Re: Those Email Signatures | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT |
| | Re: Work For Hire Agreements | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| Kim Nayyer |
| | Course Announcement: Digital Licensing Online | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| | Editorial re Copyright Collectives and Electronic Works | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT |
| Lara Pearson |
| | Registration of an unpublished work created in the 1960s | Thu Feb 19 2004 - 18:30:05 GMT |
| | Publication through public display | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:56:04 GMT |
| | Publication through public display | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:55:58 GMT |
| Lee, Dan |
| | RE: H.R. 3261? | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 21:30:04 GMT |
| Liz Davis |
| | CCC transaction reporting | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| Malla Pollack |
| | Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| | Re: 321 Studios | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| | Amicus opportunity for part-time law professors | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| Maureen Cohen Harrington |
| | Re: 321 Studios | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| me |
| | RE: what about this? a lawsuit? | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 16:15:09 GMT |
| Mike Bradley |
| | RE: Re: The Grey Album | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | Those Email Signatures | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| | RE: owner/authorship problem | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 19:30:22 GMT |
| | RE: Re: owner/authorship problem | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 19:30:22 GMT |
| | RE: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT |
| | RE: Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| | Section 201 c: any later collective work in the same series | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| | RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| | RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| Mike Holderness |
| | Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| | Legal theory translation help please | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT |
| | Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:45:20 GMT |
| Mike Oliver |
| | Re: Contribution to a collective work | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:45:20 GMT |
| Mike Phillips |
| | RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| Nancy Willard |
| | Re: Re: University professors - work for hire | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 22:20:48 GMT |
| Nick Zales |
| | The Grey Album | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| | Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| | Sale of Goodwill as Sale of Trademark | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| Ohad Mayblum |
| | Re: Re: Peter Pan. | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| Olga Francois |
| | Mellon Postdoctoral Research Fellow | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| | CALL FOR PAPERS: Deadline: February 9, 2004 | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Paula Holm Jensen |
| | RE: Legal theory translation help please | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT |
| Raza Ahmed Siddiqui |
| | Copyright in Multimedia works | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT |
| Robert E. Jones, III |
| | Copyright status of previous manuscripts of published work | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| Robert F. Bodi |
| | Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT |
| | Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| | Re: The law is interpreted | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:20 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT |
| | Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| | Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:19 GMT |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT |
| | Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT |
| | Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT |
| | Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT |
| | Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 21:30:04 GMT |
| | Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 19 2004 - 18:30:05 GMT |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 18:25:17 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of Trademark | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 18:25:17 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant" | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| | Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| | Re: Re: fair use question | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must theybesigned? | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| Robert Panzer |
| | RE: Re: Publication through public display | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| Roy Murphy |
| | Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| | Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguided | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:15:25 GMT |
| Ruth Dukelow/mlc |
| | famous person's name | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 15:55:11 GMT |
| Sandy Shepard |
| | RE: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT |
| | RE: famous person's name | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT |
| | RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| Scott Warner |
| | RE: 321 Studios | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| SimHippy[_at_]aol.com |
| | sims copyright issues for artists | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| Smith, Robert E. |
| | Lawsuit against Austin, TX Copyshops | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| | Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| | Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| | Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| | Re: [NetGold] MICROSOFT : NEWS: Ruling Puts Microsoft's 'Windows' Trademark at Risk | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| | Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguided | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:56:04 GMT |
| | Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguided | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:55:58 GMT |
| | Re: Re: University professors - work for hire | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 22:20:42 GMT |
| Steven Jamar |
| | Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 21:45:29 GMT |
| | Re: the law IS what the law IS | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| | Re: brown v board | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| | Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 16:15:09 GMT |
| | Re: permission for screen shots | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 14:50:12 GMT |
| | Re: Those Email Signatures | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| | Re: Contribution to a collective work | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| | Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | Fri Feb 06 2004 - 16:55:01 GMT |
| | Re: permission for screen shots | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 16:10:20 GMT |
| | Re: University professors - work for hire | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| Terry Carroll |
| | Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| Theodora Michaels |
| | Re: The Grey Album | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| | Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark and copyright | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| Tim Arnold-Moore |
| | RE: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"] | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| Turley, Patrick C |
| | RE: Re: University professors - work for hire | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 21:45:07 GMT |
| urbanek |
| | H.R. 3261? | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 16:15:09 GMT |
| Vance R. Koven |
| | Re: Publication through public display | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Contribution to a collective work | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT |
| | Re: famous person's name | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT |
| Wallace J.McLean |
| | It's baaa--aaack | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT |
| William T. McGrath |
| | Re: Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:15:25 GMT |
| | Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:45:20 GMT |
| | Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |