| Subject | Author | Date |
| Course Announcement: Digital Licensing Online | Kim Nayyer | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| RE: Re: The Grey Album | DeMarte, Luke | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 21:45:29 GMT |
| RE: Re: The Grey Album | Mike Bradley | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| RE: Re: The Grey Album | Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD) | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Kevin Grierson | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT |
| Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Steven Jamar | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 21:45:29 GMT |
| RE: Re: Decompiler service - Object code IS "protected" by copyright law | Ethan Ackerman | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT |
| Re: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Brock Shinen, Esq. | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| Re: The Grey Album | Theodora Michaels | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: Peter Pan. | Ohad Mayblum | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Malla Pollack | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Robert F. Bodi | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Keith Tabor | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Frederick Emrich, Editor, info-commons.org | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Robert F. Bodi | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | David Dailey | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Robert F. Bodi | Mon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Keith Tabor | Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:15:29 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Mike Holderness | Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:05:06 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Keith Tabor | Wed Mar 03 2004 - 20:50:00 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Wed Mar 03 2004 - 20:50:00 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Mark Davison | Thu Mar 04 2004 - 16:15:13 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Keith Tabor | Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:25:54 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Terry Carroll | Fri Mar 05 2004 - 16:05:19 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Fri Mar 05 2004 - 23:15:38 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Keith Tabor | Mon Mar 08 2004 - 18:05:45 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | Robert F. Bodi | Tue Mar 09 2004 - 21:10:32 GMT |
| Re: Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Thu Mar 11 2004 - 16:25:44 GMT |
| RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Eric Von Vorys | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Conlon, Julie | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | John Mitchell | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| RE: Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Eric Von Vorys | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| The Grey Album | Nick Zales | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| Re: The law is interpreted | Robert F. Bodi | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:20 GMT |
| The law is interpreted | Herb Coleman | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT |
| Re: Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Brock Shinen, Esq. | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT |
| Re: Re: 321 Studios | Kathleen Williamson | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS | Robert F. Bodi | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT |
| RE: Peter Pan. | Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD) | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT |
| Re: H.R. 3261? -- Fine! But don't call them "facts" | David Dailey | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Robert F. Bodi | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Bob Warner | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Keith Tabor | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Robert F. Bodi | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Bob Warner | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Robert F. Bodi | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Robert F. Bodi | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Keith Tabor | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Keith Tabor | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Robert F. Bodi | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Robert F. Bodi | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Robert F. Bodi | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Bob Warner | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:15:10 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Robert F. Bodi | Mon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Mon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Keith Tabor | Mon Mar 01 2004 - 16:00:13 GMT |
| Re: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Bob Warner | Mon Mar 01 2004 - 21:30:30 GMT |
| Re: the law IS what the law IS | Steven Jamar | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| RE: 321 Studios | Scott Warner | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| RE: 321 Studios | John Mitchell | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Gregory Aharonian | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| Re: 321 Studios | Maureen Cohen Harrington | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| Re: 321 Studios | Doug Isenberg | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| Re: 321 Studios | Malla Pollack | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs | Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD) | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD) | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:19 GMT |
| RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | 'Timothy Arnold-Moore' | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | John Mitchell | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 21:45:44 GMT |
| RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | John Mitchell | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 22:11:05 GMT |
| RE: Re: the law IS what the law IS. | Harold Federow | Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:45:10 GMT |
| 321 Studios | jnoble[_at_]dgsys.com | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:19 GMT |
| Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Nick Zales | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| RE: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | John Mitchell | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| RE: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | John Mitchell | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:30:17 GMT |
| Re: brown v board | Steven Jamar | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| Publishing Catalog | Brock Shinen, Esq. | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs | Mike Holderness | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs | Robert F. Bodi | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT |
| Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs | Roy Murphy | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs | Robert F. Bodi | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | I.R.Maturana | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Ethan Ackerman | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT |
| RE: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | I.R.Maturana | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| Compilation of video scenes onto DVD | Conlon, Julie | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| RE: H.R. 3261? | Lee, Dan | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 21:30:04 GMT |
| Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Robert F. Bodi | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 21:30:04 GMT |
| Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Robert F. Bodi | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT |
| Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Robert F. Bodi | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT |
| Re: Re: what about this? a lawsuit? | Robert F. Bodi | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:31 GMT |
| Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen | Steven Jamar | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 16:15:09 GMT |
| RE: what about this? a lawsuit? | me | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 16:15:09 GMT |
| H.R. 3261? | urbanek | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 16:15:09 GMT |
| RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD) | Thu Feb 19 2004 - 22:00:05 GMT |
| RE: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | John Mitchell | Fri Feb 20 2004 - 21:30:04 GMT |
| [NetGold] FOLKLORE : ARTICLE : INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW: Traditional Knowledge 'In Peril' | David P. Dillard | Thu Feb 19 2004 - 22:00:05 GMT |
| Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | Robert F. Bodi | Thu Feb 19 2004 - 18:30:05 GMT |
| Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| Re: Re: legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | Robert F. Bodi | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:19 GMT |
| Registration of an unpublished work created in the 1960s | Lara Pearson | Thu Feb 19 2004 - 18:30:05 GMT |
| RE: Re:legal speculation-purpose for legal listservs was Re: permission for screen shots | Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD) | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 18:25:17 GMT |
| Re: Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of Trademark | Robert F. Bodi | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 18:25:17 GMT |
| RE: Re: Those Email Signatures | Harold Federow | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 14:50:12 GMT |
| RE: Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of Trademark | Harold Federow | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 14:50:12 GMT |
| Re: Sale of Goodwill as Sale of Trademark | Keith Tabor | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT |
| Sale of Goodwill as Sale of Trademark | Nick Zales | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| RE: Those Email Signatures | John Mitchell | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| Re: [NetGold] MICROSOFT : NEWS: Ruling Puts Microsoft's 'Windows' Trademark at Risk | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| Re: Those Email Signatures | Keith Tabor | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT |
| Re: Those Email Signatures | Brock Shinen, Esq. | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT |
| RE: Legal theory translation help please | Paula Holm Jensen | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT |
| CCC transaction reporting | Liz Davis | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| Those Email Signatures | Mike Bradley | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| Re: Those Email Signatures | Steven Jamar | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| Re: Those Email Signatures | Kevin Grierson | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT |
| RE: Re: Publication through public display | Robert Panzer | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| RE: Re: Publication through public display | Christine L. Sundt | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 20:17:22 GMT |
| sims copyright issues for artists | SimHippy[_at_]aol.com | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| Re: Questions concerning section 506(c) | Kathleen Williamson | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| Lawsuit against Austin, TX Copyshops | Smith, Robert E. | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| [NetGold] MICROSOFT : NEWS: Ruling Puts Microsoft's 'Windows' Trademark at Risk | David P. Dillard | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| Legal theory translation help please | Mike Holderness | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| RE: owner/authorship problem | Mike Bradley | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 19:30:22 GMT |
| RE: Re: owner/authorship problem | Mike Bradley | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 19:30:22 GMT |
| registering works containing trade secrets | Baron, Robert (Phila) | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| owner/authorship problem | info[_at_]joybutler.com | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| Re: Publication through public display | Vance R. Koven | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| Re: owner/authorship problem | jnoble[_at_]dgsys.com | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| Re: owner/authorship problem | Keith Tabor | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| Questions concerning section 506(c) | David Dailey | Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:52:31 GMT |
| Re: Questions concerning section 506(c) | Joseph Pietro Riolo | Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:25:10 GMT |
| owner/authorship problem | Kathleen Williamson | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:56:04 GMT |
| Publication through public display | Lara Pearson | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:56:04 GMT |
| owner/authorship problem | Kathleen Williamson | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:55:58 GMT |
| Publication through public display | Lara Pearson | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:55:58 GMT |
| Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguided | Edward Barrow | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 18:55:05 GMT |
| Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguided | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:55:58 GMT |
| Re: Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguided | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 21:56:04 GMT |
| Re: [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguided | Roy Murphy | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:15:25 GMT |
| Re: Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | William T. McGrath | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:15:25 GMT |
| Re: Re: Contribution to a collective work | Vance R. Koven | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT |
| It's baaa--aaack | Wallace J.McLean | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT |
| Editorial re Copyright Collectives and Electronic Works | Kim Nayyer | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT |
| RE: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Sandy Shepard | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT |
| [NetGold] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: LAW : ARTICLE: How the Current Congressional Database Protection Bill Would Go Beyond Current Law, and Why It is Unconstitutional and Misguided | David P. Dillard | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 17:15:04 GMT |
| Re: Re: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"] | David Bozak | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 17:15:04 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Calle Østergaard - Troll Company ApS | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Brock Shinen, Esq. | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 17:15:04 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Mike Holderness | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:15:14 GMT |
| RE: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission forscreen shots"] | ericgoldman[_at_]onebox.com | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| RE: no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"] | Tim Arnold-Moore | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| Contribution to a collective work | Dodi Schultz | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 21:05:15 GMT |
| Re: Contribution to a collective work | Mike Oliver | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:45:20 GMT |
| Re: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Mike Holderness | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:45:20 GMT |
| no-criticism shrinkwrap [Was: "permission for screen shots"] | David Dailey | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 18:00:47 GMT |
| Contribution to a collective work | Carol Busby | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 18:00:47 GMT |
| Re: Contribution to a collective work | Steven Jamar | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| Re: Re: famous person's name | Heather Vargas | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 15:55:11 GMT |
| Standard Technical Measures | Heather Vargas | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 15:55:11 GMT |
| famous person's name | Ruth Dukelow/mlc | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 15:55:11 GMT |
| RE: famous person's name | Sandy Shepard | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT |
| Copyright in Multimedia works | Raza Ahmed Siddiqui | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT |
| Re: famous person's name | Vance R. Koven | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT |
| Re: famous person's name | Elizabeth T. Russell | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT |
| RE: Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | Mike Bradley | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:00:35 GMT |
| famous person's name | Kathleen Williamson | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 15:55:12 GMT |
| Work-made-for-hire: not labor contract | John Hampton | Mon Feb 09 2004 - 15:55:12 GMT |
| RE: Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | Jessica R. Friedman | Fri Feb 06 2004 - 22:15:02 GMT |
| Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | Keith Tabor | Fri Feb 06 2004 - 16:55:01 GMT |
| Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | William T. McGrath | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:45:20 GMT |
| Mellon Postdoctoral Research Fellow | Olga Francois | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Edward Barrow | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Jimmy Wales | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | David Dailey | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 22:20:27 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Robert F. Bodi | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Robert F. Bodi | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Robert F. Bodi | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:55:44 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | David Dailey | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Robert F. Bodi | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 18:25:17 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | John Levine | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:45:18 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | Robert F. Bodi | Mon Feb 23 2004 - 22:00:18 GMT |
| Re: Re: permission for screen shots | John Levine | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:40:10 GMT |
| RE: Re: permission for screen shots | Chris Reed | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| RE: Re: permission for screen shots | Mike Bradley | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| RE: Re: permission for screen shots | Duhaime, Diane | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| RE: Re: permission for screen shots | Chris Mohr | Fri Feb 06 2004 - 16:55:01 GMT |
| CALL FOR PAPERS: Deadline: February 9, 2004 | Olga Francois | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | Jessica R. Friedman | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Re: doll manufacturing copyright infringement claims | Steven Jamar | Fri Feb 06 2004 - 16:55:01 GMT |
| Re: permission for screen shots | John Levine | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 16:10:20 GMT |
| permission for screen shots | John Eye | Wed Feb 04 2004 - 20:10:43 GMT |
| Re: permission for screen shots | Steven Jamar | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 16:10:20 GMT |
| Re: permission for screen shots | Carol Simpson | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 21:45:23 GMT |
| Re: permission for screen shots | Steven Jamar | Wed Feb 18 2004 - 14:50:12 GMT |
| April 5, 2004 - NYC - TACD workshop on Global Access to Essential Learning Tools | James Love | Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:20:02 GMT |
| RE: Re: University professors - work for hire | Turley, Patrick C | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 21:45:07 GMT |
| RE: Re: CA: WMFH=employee | Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD) | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:21:11 GMT |
| Re: Re: University professors - work for hire | Carol Busby | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:21:11 GMT |
| Re: Re: University professors - work for hire | sstouden[_at_]thelinks.com | Thu Feb 05 2004 - 22:20:42 GMT |
| Re: Re: University professors - work for hire | Nancy Willard | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 22:20:48 GMT |
| Section 201 c: any later collective work in the same series | Mike Bradley | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| Re: Termination rights, was Work For Hire Agreements | John Levine | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| Re: University professors - work for hire | Ivan Hoffman | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| Re: University professors - work for hire | David Dailey | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:21:11 GMT |
| RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Mike Phillips | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Sandy Shepard | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Mike Bradley | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| RE: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Mike Bradley | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must theybesigned? | Robert F. Bodi | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| Copyright status of previous manuscripts of published work | Robert E. Jones, III | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements, termination | John Levine | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| Amicus opportunity for part-time law professors | Malla Pollack | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| University professors - work for hire | David Post | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| Re: University professors - work for hire | Steven Jamar | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| Re: University professors - work for hire | JQ Johnson | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements | Calle Østergaard - Troll Company ApS | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements | William T. McGrath | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements | Calle Østergaard - Troll Company ApS | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Terry Carroll | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | John Allison | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Terry Carroll | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Terry Carroll | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:55:07 GMT |
| Re: Re: Work For Hire Agreements - when must they besigned? | Ivan Hoffman | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 17:25:36 GMT |
| Re: Work For Hire Agreements | Kevin Grierson | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:45:58 GMT |
| Re: division of royalties when licensing both trademark and copyright | Theodora Michaels | Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:10:01 GMT |
| Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Robert F. Bodi | Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:56:32 GMT |
| Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Keith Tabor | Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:30:21 GMT |
| Re: Re: Decompiler service - should I seek legal advice? | Robert F. Bodi | Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:55:13 GMT |
| Re: Re: fair use question | Robert F. Bodi | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:20:38 GMT |
| Re: Re: Amazon.com "Limited License Grant" | Robert F. Bodi | Tue Feb 17 2004 - 22:25:16 GMT |