I will probably offend every librarian and archivist I've ever met with this
attempt to distinguish, but what the heck.
The main difference is how often the materials are accessed, and what goes
into the catalog -- individual items, or boxes of objects that might many
years later be of interest.
A library strives to build a collection that will serve current or
potential researchers. A library expects that a substantial portion of its
materials will be accessed by patrons. A library catalogs every object --
book, monograph, serial -- so that each individual object can be accessed
when someone needs it.
An archive strives to capture a corpus related to a topic or an
organization. The collected papers of Henry Ford, Theodore Roosevelt, Bill
Clinton, Pope John Paul II, etc. As such, an archive collects piles of
things -- all the papers they can find, all the letters to and from the
subject, etc. An archive may catalog letters from John Q. Smith, 1944, as a
single item. Later, a scholar who cares about letters from John Q. Smith,
1944, will have to go through each letter one by one. A library would not
normally ever think of cataloging each letter individually.
/rich
On Apr 7, 2005 6:00 PM, Laliberte, Matthew Dana <mdl[_at_]wpi.edu> wrote:
>
> This may seem a silly question, but what is considered an "Archive"?
> Section 108 of the Copyright Act provides exemptions to both Libraries and
> Archives for the reproduction of damaged, stolen or deteriorating works, or
> works whose format has become obsolete.
>
> What constitutes an Archive?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matthew D. Laliberte
>
> Instructional Technologist
>
> Academic Technology Center
>
> Worcester Polytechnic Institute
>
> 100 Institute Road
>
> Worcester, MA 10609
>
> Phone: 508.831.6422
>
> FAX: 508.831.5881
>
>
Received on Sat Apr 09 2005 - 03:20:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:54 GMT