I am assuming from your question, your owner is either not the sole owner of
the company or that something has happened where your client wants to
separate the claim of the copyright work from the business due to some attachment
that could possibly make a claim to this copyright. I do not think the
employment status for tax purposes controls the designation as an employee for
copyright purpose. For copyright purpose the entire relationship will be viewed
to determine the relation, not just tax status.
17 U.S.C. § 201(b) states:
"Works made for hire. In the case of a work made for hire, the employer or
other person for whom the work was prepared is considered the author for
purposes of this title, and, unless the parties have expressly agreed otherwise in
a written instrument signed by them, owns all of the rights comprised in the
copyright."
I would assume that your owner would be impugned to have the dual
designation of being both an owner and an employee.As an owner he has the right to
transfer outside claims of other owners and creditors. As an employee, if this
copyright creation is outside the employment relationship (like created at
night and weekends on his time and it was not one of his employment duties),
then a claim could be made that the copyright is owned by him personally. It is
too bad there was no written agreement as the alternative solution could
have been that your owner/employee had entered into an written agreement with
his company either pre or post creation, expressly designating the ownership
of this copyrighted work in him rather than ownership in the company, subject
to the right of the company to use the work. Otherwise, I think the company
owns the copyright.
Respectfully submitted,
Gary Poe JD University of South Florida, Department of Management
Information Science
Received on Sat Apr 23 2005 - 00:39:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT