Adam asked:
>Even though phrases cannot be copyrighted, wouldnt someone taking the
exact same phrase >from the original author and producing them in the
same manner (i.e. t-shirts) in their area still >be considered unfair
competition? (I apologize if the answer is obvious, I am just not very
well >read in unfair competition law)
Basically, no. If there are no ownership rights in the slogan (and I agree that sometimes small phrases CAN take on ownership altho I'd argue that "ET Phone Home" became a trademark and protectible as such rather than under unfair competition), there's no unfair competition. Keep in mind too that this is a two way street. Any phrase YOU put on a t-shirt that doesn't rise to the level of copyrightable can be take by anyone else. So get in and sell like mad before others figure it out. (a practical suggestion)
>Knowing that phrases cannot be copyrighted, and if producing the exact
same phrase on the >same medium of expression (t-shirts) for sale does
not qualify as unfair competition, then why do these companies place a
copyright at the bottom of the phrase?
To scare people off. And because a lot of people still think that a copyright notice has heavy legal significance. People ALSO still think that mailing yourself a copy of something you've created = copyright. Welcome to the land of urban myths.
>Is it perfectly fine for them to lable it as copyrighted when it is not?
At the moment (and given the new bill that may chance), there is no law against putting a copyright notice on something that isn't, in fact, copyrightable.
> If it is just to discourage people and gives them no real protection,
then can someone just look >at online stores that sell t-shirts with
comical phrases on them and then just print the same >comical phrases
themselves for sale?
Unless there are trademark issues, not only can they but they do it all the time.
>Although I am very confident in my ability to form legitamite parody,
that does not tie the >company with drugs or anything actually negative
to their image, even winning a case the >company could bring against
myself would still leave me with large legal bills.
Parody is a constantly moving target. And you're right that big companies have lots more money than you do.
Now can geographic entities (cities, counties, states, countries) make claims against the selling t-shirts that use there name?
No. It's parodies of registered trademarks (for example, Toker Oats for Quaker Oats) that tick people/companies off. I think the folks in Wisconsin mostly laugh at alcohol stuff, don't they? If you're unsure, follow rule one: consult a local attorney with knowledge in this area.?
>On a side note I would like to know how a man did come to obtain
copyrights to phrases. >Could you point us in the direction of the
material?
I haven't figured it out. As Geoffrey Rush says in Shakespeare in Love: It's a mystery. Anyone else?
Carol Busby
-- Carol A. Busby Attorney at Law 875 Country Club Road Eugene, OR 97401-2255 541-484-6860; fax: 541-687-1891Received on Tue Apr 26 2005 - 02:15:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT