Re: Re: Re: Patel's order & Distribution rights

From: Terry Carroll <carroll[_at_]tjc.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 16:49:59 -0400

On Wed, 18 May 2005, John T. Mitchell wrote:

> In the Hotaling case...

Let's face it: there was no real distribution in the Hotaling case. It was a "hard cases make bad law" case, with the majority bending over backward to give the plaintiff a way around the statute of limitations.

Who, me? Cynical? Received on Fri May 20 2005 - 00:49:59 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Smith: "Use of Photographs in Derivative Artwork: Fair Use Question:"
Previous message: Irvin Muchnick: "FREELANCERIGHTS Digest: A Day of Proving Continuing Infringements"
Maybe in reply to: John T. Mitchell: "Re: Re: Re: Patel's order & Distribution rights"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: PIJIP-COPYRIGHT List Archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT