Hypothetical: Artist finds photographs of a bullfight on the internet.
Takes these images, enlarges sections (often creating an abstract,
pixillated image), turns these images into a cross stitch pattern, then
produces pillows.
Question: Is this a copyright violation, or is this fair use? Contemporary artists, such as Richard Prince, have "re-photographed" Marlboro ads, presenting sections as new, conceptual work... But Warhol did get sued for using another photographer's work as the basis for his famous "Flower" paintings...
Thoughts?
Thank you,
-Daniel Smith Received on Sat May 21 2005 - 01:40:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT