On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Agenbroad, James (Civ,ARL/CISD) wrote:
> I thought that there was some caselaw that public-display (or at least
> public offering for sale) counted as "publication" under the 1909 act.
I'm pretty sure that under the 1909 Act, mere display was not a publication, either, and that the 1976 definition was merely a codification of that doctrine. The heart of publication has for a long time been distribution. Received on Fri Jun 17 2005 - 01:30:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT