Re: Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?

Hi,
Thanks for replying. You're right, I wasn't exactly saying they needed my permission, but just a note telling me they have indeed accepted my piece, so I could have avoided this current situation. Well, I haven't bought a license or anything of the sort (that $30 fee, I think?) that would declare my original work copyrighted by law. So, judging from your answer then, the other two magazines can publish my article without referencing to the first mag, right? Thank you once again.

• Original Message ----- From: "JFN" <jfnbl[_at_]earthlink.com> To: "CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property" <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org> Cc: <islam_for_life[_at_]hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 8:43 PM Subject: Re: [CNI-(C)] Magazine owns my voluntarily contributed article?

At 12:05 PM -0400 6/20/05, <islam_for_life[_at_]hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hello,
>I was wondering if someone who knows the law could help me out here.
>
>Recently, I sent an article of mine to a couple of magazines, some
>based in the
>US and others elsewhere. Now, I said in my letter that if any institution was
>interested in publishing my piece, I would like to know beforehand. Two
>magazines (one in the US, one in the UK) responded, saying they were
>interested,
>but at the same time, I came to know that another magazine (based in
>the US) had
>already printed my article without informing me. Although I did not have any
>problem with that, I was now confused as to whether I could let the other two
>magazines who had actually replied, print my piece or not. When I called those
>who had printed my piece to ask regarding this, they said sure, we give
>permission, but the other magazines must cite us as the source. I don't agree
>with them, because, firstly, I requested to be informed before
>publication of my
>article which they didn't, and secondly, because I did not receive
>any monetary
>compensation or anything of the sort from the magazine or even any
>contract that
>would stipulate that by simply submitting my article to their email address I
>give away my entire rights to my original work to them (not that my work is
>really copyrighted by law), and thirdly, the other two magazines received my
>work directly from me. Am I right? Please let me know.

I don't understand why you think your article isn't protected by copyright, but if that's correct then the first publisher didn't need your permission, and the second and third don't have to credit the first. If you do have a copyright in the article, the first might claim an implied license by virtue of the submission, but it is presumptively non-exclusive.

John Noble Received on Tue Jun 21 2005 - 21:35:00 GMT