Re: Re: Response to John Eye's June 24, 2005 post

On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, [iso-8859-1] Calle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S] wrote:

> "If the work is a motion picture or other
> audiovisual work, there is no exemption if the copy used is not lawfully
> made under the Act and the person performing it knew it or had reason to
> know it."
>
> Are you implying that "a not lawfully made copy" not being an audiovisual
> work could be used legally ????

Section 110(1) sure implies it. For works other than audiovisual works, there's no requirement that the copy or phonorecord being used for the performance be a lawfully made copy. Received on Tue Jun 28 2005 - 02:05:45 GMT