The defination of a "work" in 101 does not seem to encompass "a not lawfull made" copy of a work - thus my reading is that 110 (1) grant no excemptions for such use ??
Calle Østergaard
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, [iso-8859-1] Calle Østergaard [Troll Company A/S] wrote:
> "If the work is a motion picture or other
> audiovisual work, there is no exemption if the copy used is not lawfully
> made under the Act and the person performing it knew it or had reason to
> know it."
>
> Are you implying that "a not lawfully made copy" not being an audiovisual
> work could be used legally ????
Section 110(1) sure implies it. For works other than audiovisual works, there's no requirement that the copy or phonorecord being used for the performance be a lawfully made copy.
#############################################################This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CNI-COPYRIGHT-off[_at_]cni.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-digest[_at_]cni.org> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-index[_at_]cni.org> To postpone your subscription, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-null[_at_]cni.org> Send administrative queries to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-request[_at_]cni.org>
Visit the CNI-COPYRIGHT e-mail list archive at <https://mail2.cni.org/Lists/CNI-COPYRIGHT/>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT