They seem to have a different opinion as to whether this is a fair use.
Unfortunately, fair use is vague and there are few cases showing
examples of what is or is a fair use. Because of this, most people
either pay, forgoe the use, or failing that, settle out of court. Which
of course sets no precedent, and perpetuates the lack of caselaw to help
one make a fair use determination. Think of their offer to license as a
threat to sue if you commit acts that THEY think are infringing. At the
end of the day, if you don't license the work from them, you'll see them
in court. N.B. IANAL, this is not legal advice, but I suspect that your
"fair use" analysis is not nearly as certain of prevailing in court as
you seem to think. In the U.S., everyone has an opinion, but only seven
people write opinions that matter.
From: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
[mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org] On Behalf Of Robert Labossiere
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 5:55 PM
To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
Subject: [CNI-(C)] fees for fair use in books
I am working for a small art book publisher. Our books are quite specialized; often they are anthologies of critical/theoretical essays. My understanding is that reproduction of art works within such essays is a "fair use" in the US and "fair dealing" in Canada, i.e. exempted from the need to secure permissions and/or pay fees. Yet, if we ask an institution for an image for reproduction, what we get back is an offer to license, for a fee. What is going on here?
Robert Labossiere, MFA, Ll.B.
Toronto
Received on Fri Jul 29 2005 - 23:55:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT