The problem with 'university as author' claims is where
academics do not write at the direction and under the
control of the employer. Their works may start before
they began employment at a given institution and be taken
with them if and when they go. As they are generally on
their own, their works cannot be easily grabbed by the
bureaucracy.
Best wishes,
Albert Henderson
Former Editor, PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY 1994-2000
Contributor HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES. AN ENCYCLOPEDIA (ABC-CLIO 2002)
<70244.1532[_at_]compuserve.com>
-------------Forwarded Message----------------- From: "CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property", INTERNET:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org To: "CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property", INTERNET:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org Date: 8/9/2005 6:52 PM RE: [CNI-(C)] Re: "University as author?"
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, David Bozak wrote:
> I thought the list might find this article interesting...
>
> University as Author?
>
> The Kansas Supreme Court will soon decide whether the Kansas Board of
> Regents has to negotiate its intellectual property policy in the future, or
> whether it can simply hand down a decree – even one that asserts ownership
> of all faculty work.
>
> from http://insidehighered.com/news/2005/08/08/kansas
This is interesting... Thanks for bringing it to the attention of the list.
My sense is that federal copyright law is completely controlling here, and if it's a work made by an employee within the scope of his employment, the employer is the author; and there are no exceptions in the statute for universities. Received on Thu Aug 11 2005 - 01:50:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT