I think that I would modify "done on company time" to "allowed or
directed to do on company time"
-----Original Message-----
From: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
[mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org] On Behalf Of Terry Carroll
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 6:55 PM
To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
Subject: [CNI-(C)] Re: "University as author?"
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Albert Henderson wrote:
> This issue is about good business practice more than powers available
> to university bureaucrats.
>
> Try to imagine the president of Cal Tech telling Linus Pauling he must
> give up his copyrights because his writing is within the scope of his
> employment...
You're assuming a conclusion here. If the writing was within the scope of employment, they're not "his" copyrights, and he's not "giving them up."
> ...or done on company time.
"done on company time" is one of the factors to consider to determine whether it was within the scope of employment or whether the writer is an employee, not an independent test in and of itself.
#############################################################This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CNI-COPYRIGHT-off[_at_]cni.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-digest[_at_]cni.org> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-index[_at_]cni.org> To postpone your subscription, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-null[_at_]cni.org> Send administrative queries to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-request[_at_]cni.org>
Visit the CNI-COPYRIGHT e-mail list archive at <https://mail2.cni.org/Lists/CNI-COPYRIGHT/>. Received on Wed Aug 17 2005 - 01:30:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT