RE: Re: Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!

From: David Stewart <David.Stewart[_at_]MinterEllison.Com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:30:01 -0400


Happy to assist in starting one.

David Stewart
Head of IP/IT - Perth
Minter Ellison
Level 49, Central Park
152-158 St Georges Terrace
Perth, Western Australia 6000  

Direct Line: + 61 8 94297494
Mobile: +61 (0)416 357 505
Fax: +61 8 9429 7666
E-mail: david.stewart[_at_]minterellison.com  

www.minterellison.com

-----Original Message-----
From: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property [mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org] On Behalf Of Grierson, Kevin Sent: Tuesday, 16 August 2005 6:10 AM
To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property Subject: [CNI-(C)] Re: Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!

A plague o' both your houses.  

When lurkers come out solely to rake the muck (and with poor spelling besides--one somehow expects better from an attorney with a master's in library science), it is little wonder that the majority of individuals who did contribute meaningfully to this list just a few years ago are now gone.  

Does anyone know of a listserv/discussion group that actually discusses copyright issues rather than indulging personal vendettas and character assassinations?  

Kevin Grierson


From: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property on behalf of hazel4205[_at_]aol.com
Sent: Fri 8/12/2005 7:00 PM
To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property Subject: [CNI-(C)] Ms. Murray a Scoundral? You bet!  

I'm so sorry to but(t) in...I usually just lurk, but Sleeping with the Enemy in a figurative sense, of course, does come to mind.  

However, I have often been impressed with the staying power and survival skills of the most scoundrulous of rascals. I've seen men embarrassed on CNN at eight o'clock show up to parties at nine and act like nothing has happened.  

Resilient scoundrals should suprise no one. Those who can muster what it take to be a scoundral typically can endure the taunts. It's the nature of the beast. Tongues can wag but Ms. Murray's days are filled with interesting work and her nights, weekends and vacations filled with the luxuries only money can buy.  

She will endure this tempest and flourish. The outrage, however, is appropriate.  

lee ann torrans    

-----Original Message-----
From: Irvin Muchnick <irvmuch[_at_]yahoo.com> To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org>
Sent: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:20:30 -0400
Subject: [CNI-(C)] Re: Ms. Murray's Reputation

That is weak, Ms. Friedman.

No one here is demanding that Kay Murray take a vow of chastity and poverty. But in the mother of all copyright class actions on behalf of authors, she jumped from the plaintiff side to the defendant side before the ink on the settlement agreement was even dry. Indeed, it is reasonable to speculate that her new employment deal was in place months ago, with an original expectation that she would skirt controversy because there would be no objections and the case would be wrapped up on July 28.

Nice try at defending the indefensible.

Irv Muchnick

> If non-profits paid more, the door would swing less.
> Everyone is entitled to
> try to make a good, or better, living.
>
> Jessica R. Friedman
> www.literarypropertylaw.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
> [mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org]On <mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT%40cni.org%5dOn>
Behalf Of Mike Bradley
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:21 PM
> To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
> Subject: [CNI-(C)] Re: Ms. Murray's Reputation
>
>
> I guess Ms. Murray is a wonderful person and fine attorney. But
> isn't her move exactly the sort of move that lies at the heart of the
> corruption so many of us complain about in politics? A person works
> for a government regulator then works for the regulated industy then
> manages a government dept then works as a lobbyist lobbying the same
> dept, and so on.
>
> The swinging door is a practice condemned by every non-partisan
> good-government watchdog. It inevitably presents serious conflicts of
> interest and has been shown to undermine honest dealings in government

> and industry alike.
>
> = Mike Bradley
> www.techpubs.com
>


http://www.muchnick.net HOME OF:

IRVIN MUCHNICK'S WRESTLING JOURNALISM ARCHIVE http://wrestling.muchnick.net

CRASS ACTION
Confessions of an Internet Avenger
http://crassaction.muchnick.net

FREELANCE RIGHTS
Objections to $10-to-$18-Million Copyright Class Action Settlement http://freelancerights.muchnick.net

FREELANCE RIGHTS BLOG
http://freelancerights.blogspot.com

#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to   the mailing list <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org <mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT%40cni.org>
>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CNI-COPYRIGHT-off[_at_]cni.org <mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT-off%40cni.org> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-digest[_at_]cni.org
<mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT-digest%40cni.org> > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-index[_at_]cni.org
<mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT-index%40cni.org> > To postpone your subscription, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-null[_at_]cni.org
<mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT-null%40cni.org> > Send administrative queries to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-request[_at_]cni.org <mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT-request%40cni.org> >

Visit the CNI-COPYRIGHT e-mail list archive at <https://mail2.cni.org/Lists/CNI-COPYRIGHT/>.  

This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or otherwise protected by applicable law. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender at 757-628-5500 and delete this message.

CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: This communication is not a tax opinion. Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service regulations, to the extent that this contains tax advice, it is not intended or written to be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.

IMPORTANT - Please consider our environment before printing this email.

This email and any attachments are confidential and may be legally privileged in which case neither is intended to be waived or lost by mistaken delivery to you. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, any unauthorised use is expressly prohibited. It is your responsibility to check any attachments for viruses and defects before opening or sending them on. Minter Ellison collects personal information to provide and market our services. For more information about use, disclosure and access, see our privacy policy at http://www.minterellison.com Received on Wed Aug 17 2005 - 01:30:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT