On Aug 16, 2005, at 5:30 PM, Agenbroad, James ((Civ,ARL/CISD)) wrote:
> I think that I would modify "done on company time" to "allowed or
> directed to do on company time"
>
But the law of master-servant, agency, and employer-employee in every jurisdiction with which I am familiar says otherwise. "Done on company time" is a factor -- not a determinant, just a factor. So even if you would modify it, the law, so far as I am familiar with it, does not. Obviously if one is "allowed" or "directed", the inference of the work being within the scope is stronger, but that does NOT take away the "done on company time" as a factor.
-- Prof. Steven D. Jamar vox: 202-806-8017 Howard University School of Law fax: 202-806-8567 2900 Van Ness Street NW mailto:sjamar[_at_]law.howard.edu Washington, DC 20008 http://www.law.howard.edu/faculty/pages/jamar/ "Example is always more efficacious than precept." Samuel Johnson, 1759Received on Wed Aug 17 2005 - 02:30:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT