Point taken.
From: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
[mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 6:30 PM
To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
Subject: [CNI-(C)] Re: "University as author?"
On Aug 16, 2005, at 5:30 PM, Agenbroad, James ((Civ,ARL/CISD)) wrote:
I think that I would modify "done on company time" to "allowed or
directed to do on company time"
But the law of master-servant, agency, and employer-employee in every
jurisdiction with which I am familiar says otherwise. "Done on company
time" is a factor -- not a determinant, just a factor. So even if you
would modify it, the law, so far as I am familiar with it, does not.
Obviously if one is "allowed" or "directed", the inference of the work
being within the scope is stronger, but that does NOT take away the
"done on company time" as a factor.
-- Prof. Steven D. Jamar vox: 202-806-8017 Howard University School of Law fax: 202-806-8567 2900 Van Ness Street NW mailto:sjamar[_at_]law.howard.edu Washington, DC 20008 http://www.law.howard.edu/faculty/pages/jamar/Received on Thu Aug 18 2005 - 01:25:01 GMT
"Example is always more efficacious than precept."
Samuel Johnson, 1759
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT