RE: referral for Florida lawyer

From: Neil Smith <nsmith[_at_]sheppardmullin.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:15:30 -0400


Try Jennifer Whitelaw. A better trademark lawyer (excellent) than you need but on the ground and good for what you need. Neil Smith

Here is contact info:

WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP
3838 Tamiami Trail North
Third Floor
Naples, Florida 34103    

Telephone: 239-262-1001
Facsimile:: 239-261-0057
E-mail: mail[_at_]whitelawfirm.com

 .................................................................


Note new contact information:

Neil A. Smith
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Four Embarcadero Center
17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Direct Dial: (415) 774-3239
Direct Fax: (415) 403-6084
Email: nsmith[_at_]sheppardmullin.com

-----Original Message-----
From: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property [mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org] On Behalf Of JFN Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 2:31 PM To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property Subject: [CNI-(C)] referral for Florida lawyer

I need to refer someone to a Florida lawyer around Tampa/St. Pete. The case is in the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. There's a supposed copyright and/or trademark infringement claim, but the lawyer doesn't need to know anything about either to know that the complaint is without merit. You'd have to see it to believe it. Plus, the plaintiff's lawyer has broken every rule in the book, starting out by serving the complaint without a summons, demanding instead that defendants send the answer to him at his office; scheduling a hearing on a motion for preliminary injunction without serving the motion, and agreeing to cancel it only if defendants took down their website. There's lot's more. A good lawyer would have a field day with this.

The defendants have a start-up business and not a lot of cash, but there is plainly a Rule 11 motion (or state law equivalent) that should cover fees and costs; and I think there's another few thousand dollars for an agreement that the defendants won't file a disciplinary action with the state bar association, if that can be pulled off without violating some local rule. I need to send this to a decent litigator who plays rough, and would rather chew up opposing counsel than chew up his client's retainer.

John Noble

#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
     the mailing list <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CNI-COPYRIGHT-off[_at_]cni.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-digest[_at_]cni.org> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-index[_at_]cni.org> To postpone your subscription, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-null[_at_]cni.org> To resume mail list message delivery from postpone mode, E-mail to
<CNI-COPYRIGHT-feed[_at_]cni.org>

Send administrative queries to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-request[_at_]cni.org>

Visit the CNI-COPYRIGHT e-mail list archive at
<https://mail2.cni.org/Lists/CNI-COPYRIGHT/>.

This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Please visit our website at www.sheppardmullin.com

Received on Wed Sep 28 2005 - 02:15:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT