> I think the point was made earlier that copyright is (at present, at
least),
> an "opt-in" type of law rather than an "opt-out" law. Copyright owners
have
> no obligation to opt out of an infringer's planned copying of their works.
> For this reason, it's also arguable that Google's whole caching system is
a
> system of copyright infringement.
I agree completely.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:55 GMT