I'm a librarian and first-time poster to this forum, hoping my question
isn't too far off-base: our newspaper library handles requests for
permission to use our photos or news articles, and we have one that's
unusual, to us.
An artist wants our permission to make a painting from a photograph of ours that ran in the newspaper. I understand that if the painting is an adaptation, or a derivative work, or very close to a replica of the original, then permission is required. Is that correct?
My impulse is to give permission to the artist to do the painting, and charge him our minimal permission fee for the photo, provided he doesn't sell the painting. Then if he does sell the painting, we'd charge him another licensing fee.
Any insight would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Debbie
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:56 GMT